User talk:Pandacan

Development Communication Policy Science

Hi, some comments

the article needs more references. Much of the text is completely unreferenced
where you do have refs they are sometimes incomplete (at least three lack page numbers). Note that journal titles should be italicised
There are remarkably few wikilinks to other articles in your text
your text contains unencyclopaedic personal opinions eg There is a need to bridge research and policy specially the science-policy interface. It's fair enough to give the attributed opinions of Jones and Walsh, but not to claim that as a fact. I'd lose that sentence
I've fixed the headings, if you want to make any of them sub-headings, just add another = on each side of the text. I personally wouldn't have a new heading for each paragraph, but that's your call

I made these edits Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Development communication policy science for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Development communication policy science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development communication policy science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Home Lander (talk) 15:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peace Quotient (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Festucalex were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peace Quotient and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 10:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandacan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 〜 Festucalex • talk 10:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peace Quotient

Hello, Pandacan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peace Quotient, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peace Quotient

Hello, Pandacan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Peace Quotient".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 13:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]