User talk:Panda619/Archive 2

One Piece specials

I really hope you're planing on expanding that list, right now it's just a copy paste from the media list, which is not ok and it will be redirected unless it proves it can be an article on its own.★Trekker (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@★Trekker (talk) I will try to add short summaries and staff information now. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:One Piece World Seeker Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:One Piece World Seeker Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced material concerning a monolith on the Brihadisvara Temple

There's no source for it being the largest, you really must stop adding unsourced material, especially when it makes such major claims. Doug Weller talk 13:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent and wrongly date empires

There evidently was no "Chera empire", read Chera dynasty carefully. You've also mentioned some empires that were not empires at the time concerned. Please be more careful. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Okay, I will be Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 13:34, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP autoblock

@Alexf: Hello I think my account is auto blocked because there is a shared IP block for another user account, Please unblock Thank You. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 08:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Panda619 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Panda619 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

autoblock

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Procedural decline only. If you are autoblocked, we need to know the IP address or other username involved. This should come up in the message that appears when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Panda619 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Panda619 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

I think my account is auto blocked because there is a shared IP block for another user account

Blocking administrator: Alexf (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You need to follow the instructions so we can find your block. Note there is some overlap in your edits, though only a little. You may want to explain why this is the case. Yamla (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I will be honest, that account was mine I did some stupid things long ago(over an year) and got blocked I don't even remember properly what happened, after that I think I created this account I was not active for a long time but since past two weeks I have been using Wikipedia actively and I believe i have been contributing in at least some useful ways and learning and following Wikipedia policies and guidelines. so yeah please unblock, I think I can be useful, Thank You. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 11:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You promised to stick to a single account. Clearly, you did not do that. That's why the autoblock kicked in. Next time, we'll block your account indefinitely. Wait out your autoblock, it'll take 24 hours. --Yamla (talk) 11:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I will be more careful, I am sticking with single account only and so will I be unblocked after 24 hours ? Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Please do not break your promise again. --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 11:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Sorry to disturb again, You have marked my userpage with sockpuppet template, that's fine right? after 24 hours that will be gone? --Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 12:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone that as you have agreed to stop using that other account. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and just want to say i did not use the other account, I just saw the login details were saved in my browser so I logged in to see when i created that account and logged out after few seconds and I thought only editing with other account is bad and that account was blocked so I was not aware just logging in will trigger a auto block, anyway thank you again. --Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Viswasam

I blocked your opponent and did not block you, because you have made efforts to at least warn them at their talk page, but you have still overstepped WP:3RR. Please remember that 3RR applies to everybody, and clear vandalism and serious BLP violations are the only exceptions. Outside of them, edit-warring is never a solution. You should have reported them to WP:3RRN and wait until they get blocked. The sky was not going to fall if the article stayed another several hours at the version different from what you prefer. Please be more careful in the future.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I thought since It was clearly unsourced, So It would be a exception but I stopped after a while and reported, I will be more careful Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced text per se is not even a violation, and I believe they added a sourced text, they just used a poor source in place of a better source. Anyway, I think we now look at the situation in the same way. If they reappear to edit the article, please bring the issue to EFPP again.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will do that next time and the source was old and It states "expected to make around Rs 200 crore to Rs 250 crore worldwide in the coming weeks" but he entered 220 crore and In talk pages he keeps claiming 180 crore as the figure. In addition to that he is trying to intimidate and also kinda attacked me in native slang. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 11:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahavir Karna first look.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]