User talk:Pamwiki1

Enbridge edits

Hi Pamwiki1, I have looked over your edits at Enbridge and overall your changes seem reasonable. However, at [1] you have removed all mention of their involvement in renewable energy. We are supposed to remain impartial here so I think it is appropriate to re-insert that information balanced by some kind of summary of how much Enbridge has received in government subsidies to diversify this way, and perhaps a merge with the section on how their fuel cell generation plant has failed to live up to their claims. Simply deleting that section makes it easy for someone pushing Enbridge's PR spin on their activities to say you have deleted cited material and put it back without any qualification. Editing the section to add further cited information to counter the spin is a better way of doing things. On the other hand I do not think deleting the paragraph on the various corporate awards was unreasonable as that information was not notable. Cheers and welcome to Wikipedia, Owen.

Djapa Owen (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Owen, It seems that after you went through and okayed some of my edits, someone removed them. How can I get them back? Thanks for catching that I removed more than I should.. I had meant to remove their section on corporate awards. Thank you for your help and patience, Pamwiki1

Hi Pamwiki,

If someone does an edit which you disagree with you should be able to see what happens on your watchlist (up there ^). To see exactly what changes have been made click the 'diff' link, and if you think the edit is unjustified or constitutes vandalism you can then click 'undo'. However, undoing or reverting the same edit three times in a day is not allowed, and it is always better to discuss the issue on the talk page and try to reach consensus and doing so gives your edits more protection from being changed. Discussing and cooperating probably produces better articles too.

When you edit talk pages you are supposed to sign your post by typing four tildes (~ four times) after your post which inserts your tagline like this; "~ ~ ~ ~" without the spaces produces Djapa Owen (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pamwiki1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type {{helpme}} on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Capitalismojo (talk) 03:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pamwiki1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Pamwiki1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enbridge COIN

Hi, I have started a conflict of interest investigation on IP 161.141.1.1 as that IP is owned by Enbridge corporation and has been doing a lot of pro-Enbridge edits to the Enbridge article. As you have also contributed to that article I thought you might be interested to have a look. Cheers, Djapa Owen (talk) 16:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]