User talk:Pamri/Archive 1

Userpage	Talk	Leave message
Talk archives:	1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10	Status: Inactive

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam [Spade] 15:56, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board.

Hi. You might want to list yourself at Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board. utcursch 13:08, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Why the edit?

Could you please let me know why yopu thought this content inappropriate? I'd like to know? Your edit Cheers Arunram 05:23, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

We should sync up

We both seem to quite keen to keep 2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_in_India updated. That is great! I have added a fair amount of content all day. Let us team together and work on joint goals. What say? BTW, I reverted an edit by you. I belive the content is relevant. Lets discuss this if my explanations isnt adequate on the revert. Cheers Arunram 16:12, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hi. Please provide edit summaries. Thanks. utcursch 11:41, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

Seeking you support

I am seeking your support and participation for starting the "Indian Collaboration of the Week". Please enlist your support on the page Wikipedia_talk:Indian_wikipedians'_notice_board if you would like to support. Thanks Arunram 08:57, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I seek your support in bootstrapping WP:INCOTW. The infrastructure is in place. We only need a popular support and participation for the COTW. Please spread the word around. Also nominate / vote for your topic/article. Regards Arunram 15:17, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

On Sarvadarsanasamgraha and Madhvacharya

Thank you for the communication. You are correct. Sarvadarsanasamgraha was written by Madhavacharya, the monist and not by Madhvacharya, the dualist. But I think it is good to create a page on Madhavacharya but I do not have much information on him. If one searchs now for Madhavacharya in Wikipedia, she/he is taken to the page of Madhvacharya. This has to be corrected. And immediately. Hope somebody (perhaps any administrators of Wikipedia) will do that.

More information on the talk page of Madhvacharya. MANOJTV 08:25, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

tagging articles

Please put semi-permanent templates like {{expansion}} that only are useful to editors, on talk pages (the only exception I can think of would be the different stub templates). This is to Avoid self references as much as possible and make our content more useful to third party users. Thank you. :) --mav 08:54, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ted Hitler

Thanks for adding the link to the transcript in Stephen Colbert article. I added the redirect for Ted Hitler mostly for a laugh, but your edit made it relevant. Thanks.MpegMan 06:26, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Swastika

Perhaps you could have a look at the changes to this article and reconsider your vote as to its FAC. Cheers, Smoddy (_t^g_e^c_k) 22:29, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sarai

Great work pamri. nice wikifying and edits to sarai. viyyer 30 June 2005 18:55 (UTC)

Congratulations

For your excellent devotion to the Wikipedia community, you have been awarded a total of three (3) Smart Badges. Use them well, and don't tell anyone that they came from me. (Rajul 23:55, 20 July 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for creating this template. But could you give at least one example, I'm finding hard to refer to the documentary film Harab libnan (War of Lebanon). CG 10:35, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

ON "spam"

Check out Special:Contributions/Uriah923 and the user has constantly added links to the ON site, which has been created by him and which I believe is a Sock puppet of CHansen and MarkMcB, who is supposedly the founder of the site and has an article on himself as well. pamri 08:04, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Pamri, you have no idea what you are talking about. Fact error 1: I did not create ON. Fact error 2: I am most definitely not a sock puppet, as evident by how fast I am typing. Fact error 3: There is not an ON site nor an article on MarkMcB, as evident by your empty links. Fact error 4: My contributions include much valuable content up and above links to ON. Links have been used only where they are necessary as References. I suggest you do more research before posting your conspiracy theories. Uriah923 19:09, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Checking from your talk page, I am not the only one doing the conspiracy theories. pamri 02:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

Too bad that doesn't make you right. Uriah923 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Law

Thanks for the site. I've registered myself there. =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:36, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Template:lc

Hi Pamri,
You suggested this template on my talk page. this doesn't seem to work. I mean nothing shows up on the page. Does the template work like that only.Gaurav1146 10:55, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Life in India

I've made some design changes to Template:Life in India. I've removed the flag as it loads the server. If you don't like the current version, you can revert. =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:04, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Economy and Bollywood

Dear Pamri,

I don't think that article is a good idea at all, but I'm going to talk to you before putting it up for deletion. It is NOT at all clear to me what you want to prove with this article. So far, the two films you've added seem to illustrate "films as protests against capitalism", which has more to do with ideology than economy, and seems rather POV. What about all the films that glorify the family firm? I'm always astounded by the matter-of-fact acceptance of nepotism in the plot lines of Bollywood films. OF COURSE Prem will enter the family firm. OF COURSE we'll set up an automotive division for him. Then there's the economics of dowry, marriages across class lines, etc. etc. It's just a huge sprawling topic and it would all be original research.

I think there might be a good article in a discussion of film as PART of the economy of India, as industry. I just finished reading Tejaswini Ganti's book, Bollywood, and he/she has a very good discussion of the economics of film. That's a good place to start. Zora 08:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage	Talk	Leave message
Talk archives:	1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10	Status: Inactive