User talk:PallaviSave

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cinechicken (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cinechicken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 03:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 03:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cinechicken has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cinechicken. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming your website

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CineChicken on Reliable Sources Noticeboard

Hi, a discussion about a website that you appear to be promoting has been started on the reliable sources noticeboard. The discussion is located here. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I see you are working on a draft for the organization. I think you are related to the organization and are promoting it. You have been warned before to not add those links. Now, 20 days later, you have continued. Please stop. If you persist in adding cinechicken to Wikipedia pages, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you in advance for your kind understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. In order to edit pages from your disruptive editing i failed to see that TheRedPenOfDoom already gave you level 3 warning. You deserve level 4. I will mention once again "You are constantly promoting a new website Cinechicken . Please don't add it anywhere. You even tried to create a page Cinechicken which was rejected." C E (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]