User talk:Palbert01
21 August 2006
[edit]Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in TOSlink, Coaxial cable, and many other pages. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia, as you did in F connector. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks.
Wikipedia References
[edit]Hi. Please read these article about references, see WP:CITE and "Wikipedia: The Missing Manual". Please do more than just drop a URL between <ref> and </ref>. Thanks in advance. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 04:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Cities are NOT school articles
[edit]Cities are not school articles, thus school information doesn't go in the "History" section of city articles, instead it belongs in "Education" section. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline (USCITY) for list of section names and order of section for city articles. Please fix your city edits, see Special:Contributions/Palbert01. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 23:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- The additions are NOT "school articles". The additions were all for the city's school(s) that have been closed (unified) for 40+ years. City history commonly includes history of the town's schools no longer in operation. As I understand the "Education" section, it is used for "Current Education", not historical education. Not one of the additions made is a current school.
- Ok, but the way you wrote it wasn't obvious that school(s) were closed. The use of "was" could mean their mascot was changed. In the History section, the fact that school(s) closed is the important detail, NOT the mascot name, and you didn't even state the school(s) closed. If the text only talks about mascots, then it belongs in the Education section, because the school mascot is not the city mascot, though people might consider them the same, but they are not. The USCITY guideline doesn't say the Education section only includes current schools. RECOMMEND: move text to new Education section, then clarify and expand. In some way, say the school closed and consolidated into USD ### which students currently attend. If the year of closing is known, then state it too. If you don't know the USD, then state it generically that the school merged into a Unified School District, then someone can add the USD number later. Adding this extra information is more useful to readers than just stating a mascot name. The Education section should be added in the same location as shown in the USCITY guideline. Thanks. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 5 January
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Formoso, Kansas page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 7 January
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
- On the Little River, Kansas page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
- On the Assaria, Kansas page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Adding reference at Oxford, Kansas
[edit]Thanks for your addition of a reference at Oxford, Kansas. I noticed you did it manually, which is fine. In case you weren't aware of it, ProveIt is a useful tool for adding and editing references. You can enable it at your Preferences under "Gadgets" (I recommend the classic version). With ProveIt, adding and editing references should be much easier and less tedious. Regards– Gilliam (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Palbert01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Laton, Kansas has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Nihlus 06:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
Nomination of Monroe, Kansas for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monroe, Kansas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monroe, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Orbitello, Kansas for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orbitello, Kansas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbitello, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Palbert01. I'm not sure what your objections are to my edits or why you keep reverting them, but mine are within policy. First of all, referring to him as "Dale Dodrill" under "Early life", violates WP:NAMES, which states "the subject's full name, if known, should be given in the lead sentence [...] After the initial mention of any name, the person should generally be referred to by surname only." As for your other edits, they almost completely split the article up into fragmented, one-sentence paragraphs, which is a violation of MOS:BODY ("The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized, since they can inhibit the flow of the text [...] Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading") and WP:PARAGRAPH ("Paragraphs should be short enough to be readable, but long enough to develop an idea. [...] One-sentence paragraphs are unusually emphatic, and should be used sparingly. Articles should rarely, if ever, consist solely of such paragraphs."). You may also benefit from reviewing Wikipedia:Narrative flow, which, although just an essay and not a policy, reflects traditional features of Featured and Good articles and cites several important policy precedents to back up its arguments.
As for your edit summary: "The original text is well within the wikipedia definitions. (Not true, see above). Paragraphs are to be short and express an idea (based on what Wikipedia policy, can you cite it? This would seem to directly contradict what I cited above). Your revisions actually create longer paragraphs and combine topics (yes, that is the point, it aids flow). While my writing may not be YOUR PERSONAL PREFERENCE, that is not a wikiepedia criteria (Not true, see above, also no need to shout). See pages for Terry Bradshaw and Roger Staubach which are much longer and more detailed than Dale Dodrill for reference (Other stuff is just that - other stuff. Wikipedia is a work in progress, perhaps there are errors on those pages that have yet to be corrected or completely different contexts)." Unless you can provide me with actual policy-based arguments for your edits, they will be reverted, but in the interest of assuming good faith and not edit warring, I will await your reply. Canadian Paul 17:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Canadian Paul, My objection is that you have rewritten the article based on your personal preferences and not due to wikipedia guidelines. I previously noted that in all caps that you got hung up on as yelling rather than as emphasis.
The paragraph guideline states “Paragraphs should be short enough to be readable, but long enough to develop an idea. Overly long paragraphs should be split up, as long as the cousin paragraphs keep the idea in focus.” My paragraphs developed an idea or point. Your edits combined all paragraphs and points into a single paragraph per subheading. For example, you combined his marriage and business into a single paragraph. These are two separate topics that have been combined based on your preference...not wikepedia’s guideline...of having one paragraph per subheading. This is a common theme for your edits to the page.
Ultimately, your edits have lost the flow of the article. It may as well be a list of bullet points with no detail. This type of over zealous editing based on personal preference is why people stop contributing content and funds to wikipedia. Congrats!
- Assuming good faith, I will respond to everything that is not a personal attack in your reply, but I will do so at the article's talk page, where this discussion is more appropriate. Canadian Paul 20:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Posted on the article's talk page. Please reply there. Canadian Paul 20:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Palbert01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Calhoun, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calhoun, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Hourglass, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hourglass, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Marney, Kansas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNIS mistook this ghost postoffice for ghost town, there is nothing to see here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 22:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Vallonia, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vallonia, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mangoe (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Lawnridge, Kansas for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawnridge, Kansas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawnridge, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Easdale, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easdale, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mangoe (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Hog Back, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hog Back, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mangoe (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Martin, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mangoe (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Mendota, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mendota, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mangoe (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Palatine, Kansas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palatine, Kansas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.