User talk:Pakwaseb

Welcome

Hello Pakwaseb, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Pakwaseb, good luck, and have fun. --PamD 16:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaanga

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please note a few points about this article:

Please give sources (references) for everything you say.
Please link your article to other appropriate articles.
Please take care to write in full sentences and to get spaces around punctuation right.

Thanks. PamD 16:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saraiki Tradition

So you just start over again? Why don't you do something useful with your time, instead of creating a useless article that violates Wikipedia policy and wasting other people's time. --JorisvS (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the Saraiki Tradition is not useless first of All.we saraiki people want to promote Saraiki Culture and their Tradition.please help me how to protect my page ? i will wait your guide about protect a page ,i dont want some one interruption on my rich culture page ,please help me. i want to article on Saraiki tradition .im Sorry i dont know how to give it Links with others Saraiki pages please also help in this regard .

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghayiroli Saraiki Shalwar

Hello Pakwaseb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ghayiroli Saraiki Shalwar for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Mabalu (talk) 01:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Shah puri that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 09:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shah puri with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 09:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Shah puri with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 09:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 09:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shah puri with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 09:49, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BEWARE This is warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shah puri with this edit, you may be blocked blocked so STOP VANDALISM Saraikistan (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are again warned against VANDALISM Saraikistan (talk) 10:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC) You are again and again and again warned against VANDALISM Saraikistan (talk) 11:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC) I see you blocked very soon for your unsourced vandalism Saraikistan (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that "vandalism" is not the right word for what you have been doing, as I see no reason to doubt that you sincerely believe that you are making improvements. However, you need to be aware of the following facts:

A Wikipedia article must be written from a neutral point of view, and editing to promote a particular opinion or point of view is unacceptable.
Any content which is challenged or questioned must not be restored unless you can provide reliable sources that support the content, It is not sufficient that you are personally convinced that your edits are right: you must be able to show evidence.
When there is a disagreement about content of an article, the thing to do is to discuss the issues on the article's talk page, and try to reach agreement. It is not helpful for two or more editors to just keep repeating their own edits, hoping the others will give up. Continually repeating the same, or substantially the same, edits is known as edit warring, and can lead to being blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After last warning this user is still free to voilet TALK PAGE FIRST RULE and invoved in edit war. no blocking to date after persistent ignorance of warnings Saraikistan (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on several articles, continuing after being informed that doing so was unacceptable. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saraiki dialects

Hello Pakwaseb,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Saraiki dialects, may be copied from http://www.oocities.org/saraikiz/saraiki.htm. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saraiki dialects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

...for your message on my talk page. I have answered there. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Saeed Ahmed and JamesBwatson There is no such conspiracy. I am also a Saraiki and Saeed (Pak waseb) is also a saraiki. Dear for proving Shahpuri being a dialect of Punjabi i added sources as per local websites (see below)of Sargodha and Khaushab Districts where this dialect is spoken. Additionally as per Census 1998 of Pakistan Statistic division of Pakistan issued booklet for each district figures. Unfortunately that is not available on line but Saeed when you go back Pakistan you me get a copy in which local people have opted 90% as Punjabi. Additionally i have added international websites links (Mostly from india). See all the references please (see below). Please dont claim those as Saraiki who dont consider them self Punjabi. We all live in Punjab Provinces. Punjab means land between five rivers so technically we all being local are punjabi. Linguistically through out Punjab or other parts of world Languages change after every 12 kilometers. I can communicate with all dialects of Punjab province and every other person also know the fact about mutual intelligentibility of saraiki and punjabi. we must love each other and live together. No one disrespects beautiful saraiki (Southern dialects of Punjabi) culture but we cant call every one saraiki forcefully. Best Regards and Special Thanks JamesBwatson.

References

^ http://sargodha.dc.lhc.gov.pk/?page_id=1335 ^ Punjabi University, Patiala ^ The Indo-Aryan Languages By Colin P. Masica (page 18) ^ http://www.sikhchic.com/history/mother_tongue_the_many_dialects_of_punjabi ^ http://languages.iloveindia.com/punjabi.html ^ http://sargodha.dc.lhc.gov.pk/?page_id=1335 ^ http://www.pakistan.web.pk/threads/khushab-district.7507/ ^ http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/letters/04-May-2012/more-provinces — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saraikistan (talk • contribs) 04:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Edit warring on multiple articles. Jim1138 (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saraiki language. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent edit warring, and harassment of another user. If you wish to continue to edit Wikipedia, you need to realise that Wikipedia is a collaborative project. It works by editors cooperating, and when we disagree, we discuss things, and accept that consensus determines what should be included, even when we are personally convinced that consensus is wrong. Wikipedia does not work by individual editors endlessly repeating the edits that they want, in the hope that others who disagree will eventually give up. You should also understand that editors whose sole purpose is to use Wikipedia to further a campaign or cause are not likely to last long. Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of an cause. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The length of the block has been increased, because you have been evading the block by editing without logging in. You have been given instructions as to how you may request an unblock, and simply evading the block without making such a request is not the way to do it. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Wikipedia was never a free edit site and I doubt there are any such conspiracies going on.

Skamecrazy123 (talk) 01:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

The reason stays the same as the notice above: edit warring. Block lenghth is 2 weeks. Lectonar (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Thalochi dialect does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 22:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Punjabi and Lahnda dialects, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent edit warring and other disruptive editing after expiration of last block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gaanga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaanga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaanga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]