User talk:PakleniVuk

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is that vandalism came from your side . You are changing corect and precise info that I have added, with incorrect. OK ,Kosovo territory is a bit confusing thing to argue. And it's ok to have deferent opinion about that issue and to go on midle line for both sides . But you are adding whrong and pretentious stuff to this article. Vandalism or disruptive editing is if I start to change names of villages in Albania that have Slavic names and where Serbian people leave. But I don't do that. For instance you do the same thing to mountain in Serbia where Albans do not leave (not one Albanian ) . It's a big theme but I hope I have been precise. PakleniVuk (talk) 21:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your inputs and answer, PakleniVuk. I wish you successful editing on Wikipedia. Do have in mind basic Wiki rules, including Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 01:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your recent editing history at Light aircraft shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 22:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]