User talk:Paisarepa/Archives/2021/March

Your signature

I hope you know your signature's link to this talk is broken and leads to Usertalk:Paisarepa. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

I wasn't, I appreciate you letting me know. Paisarepa 13:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Kamel Nacif Wiki

Hello, i dont know if you are a real person or a bot, dont know if you are aware of the mexican issues and the historical moment we are living on, as lots of influent rich people in mexico is being formaly accused, starting a war in courts and media that highlights the prevalent corruption and the abuse of power. As today, the millionaire Kamel Nacif, accused of operating a big scale sexual trafficking and child pornography network, is still powerfull and untouchable, as he did effectively put in jail the journalist who revealed the crimes, this after torturing her. Today he has the monetary resources to flee justice, even the Interpol, this becouse his influence in Lebanon politics and businesses. Its really sad to see the wikipedia article intruducing this being as just a businessman, without making any consideration in the introduction. What defines this person nowdays is not his business and successs, is what he is running from, All the quotation are real, all the work is there, so WHY did you delete all my work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:2F0:9240:5228:1C86:3D10:8652:84A4 (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

You need a reliable source if you want to add content, especially if it is controversial content. Paisarepa 00:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Didnt i add a reliable source? Do you know spanish? Did you read or at least clicked on the articles? You did point my edition as vandalism, is this vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:2F0:9240:5228:1C86:3D10:8652:84A4 (talk) 00:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

"Animalpolitico.com", "infobae.com", etc., are not reliable sources. See WP:RS. Paisarepa 00:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

What?!!! So Proceso is a reliable source, but Animal Politico isnt? Is not a self published, as with Infobae, has a workteam, an editor in chief, it follows rules and are accountable for what they are saying, the journalists there sign with their names, and you can get the real physical address. Is not a forum, is not a self publisheed note, sorry, but your evaluation is wrong. What can I do for another User to checkfact my work? You are not objetive nor imparcial, I need someone else from the Wikipedia community to help me with this article. I wont leave this as is. You even didnt check that the second reference which is there before my edition, and isnt pointing to what is talking about, becaouse someone did delete the section which specify the criminal status of this person:

Once considered one of the richest men in Mexico,.[2]

Once considered one of the richest men in Mexico, he is now wanted for child trafficking and the torture of journalist Lydia Cacho.

You dont care at all in this article, i need to report you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:2F0:9240:5228:1C86:3D10:8652:84A4 (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your content additions also don't make any sense. I don't know if you are using an online translator such as Google Translate and it isn't working effectively but many sentences have no meaning in the English language. Paisarepa 01:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)