User talk:Pais/Archive 2

Image resizing.

The image used in anisotropic filtering was ALREADY fair use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anisotropic_compare.png it was ALREADY reduced resolution and comprised two screenshots and the resolution it used was of CRITICAL IMPORTANCE to the technical content it was showing for anyone clicking through. Now it has been diminished by your fiddling. I've already defended this image against resize and deletion but I can't be bothered anymore. I'm sick of doing work on Wikipedia only to have the entropy of wikifiddlers erase it. Revert the edit if you know how, I tried and it was gone in the preview. Dorbie —Preceding undated comment added 22:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hey. I've noticed you've been resizing lots of images, which is cool. If you're interested, there's this, a tool created to streamline the process. It should prove to be quite useful, if you like it. Thanks for all your hard work, and happy editing. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll give it a try. Pais (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnOpenBook.jpg

Hello, Pais. Delete it then. The article is about the author, not really about the book. Though the book might be mentioned, and covers are used to promote the book, I'm not willing to take this to the Supreme Court... I liked the Obama-related userboxes on your page, I'm surprised to see that there are still a few people with an independent mind on Wikipedia. Kraxler (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal FC.svg

Hello Pais. I just noticed that you are trying to replace the file File:Arsenal FC.svg with File:Arsenal FC.png. SVG files (which are vector graphics) are preferable to PNG files, which are raster graphics. See Wikipedia:Preparing_images_for_upload#Use_SVG_over_PNG for more details. I have reverted your changes and listed the PNG version for deletion. - Gump Stump (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, except that non-free images are supposed to be low-resolution only. If we use SVG graphics for non-free logos, they can be as large as anyone wants. The whole point of keeping non-free images low-resolution is to have them look like crap at high resolution, thus discouraging copyvio. Pais (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The file type (and the ease of creating a high resolution file from a low resolution one) doesn't really matter. Whether it's a PNG or an SVG rendered at 1000px, both are not complying with the Wikimedia non-free content policy. What matters is that any usage of any non-free content on Wikipedia is rendered at the smallest size possible while still being useful, regardless of file type. If someone chooses to download that SVG and violate fair use guidelines themselves, that is their choice and their responsibility. SVG files are much easier to edit, use, and store on Wikipedia, so they are still preferred, even for non-free content. - Gump Stump (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, good job with all the image resizes. There's a list of SVG image editors at List of vector graphics editors, many of which are free, if you want to try resizing SVGs. I use Inkscape, personally. - Gump Stump (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since SVGs can be rendered at any size, there's no point in resizing them. An SVG whose "nominal resolution" is 292×344 pixels is just as much or as little a violation of WP:NFCC#3b as one whose "nominal resolution" is 737×867 pixels. I've just been reading the discussions at Wikipedia talk:Image use policy/Archive 12#File:Man Utd FC .svg and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 33#PNG better than SVG if the logo is copyrighted ? and it seems there is currently no consensus on the question whether non-free logos should be SVG or PNG, but I didn't see anyone suggesting that nominally "smaller" SVGs are better than nominally "larger" ones. The only consensus I did find is that if SVGs are used, they can't have more detail than would normally show up at thumbnail size in an article. Pais (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~There is a point to resizing them, as you just said ("The only consensus I did find is that if SVGs are used, they can't have more detail than would normally show up at thumbnail size in an article")~~. That goes for the file page as well (see for example ZooFari's comment at 17:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC) on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 33#PNG better than SVG if the logo is copyrighted ?). SVGs have no inherent resolution, so what matters is how large they are rendered when used on Wikipedia. The policies are ambiguous, no doubt; but if non-free SVGs are acceptable, the way to best (i.e. most conservatively) comply with Wikimedia's non-free content guidelines is to never render non-free SVGs at high resolution, whether on the file page or in an article. - Gump Stump (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I misread when you wrote "detail" vs. "resolution". Ignore my first sentence there. - Gump Stump (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:1965CCFC.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1965CCFC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. 67.85.125.17 (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair-use images

Hi, File:Are You The One? - EP.jpg, File:AoE3 Real-Physics All-in-One.JPG, File:AnitaMuiFinalConcert2.jpg, File:Animated Skull.JPG, File:AmenAndrewsVol5b.jpeg, File:AmenAndrewsVol5a.jpeg, File:AmenAndrewsVol4b.jpeg, File:AmenAndrewsVol4aVersion3.jpeg, File:Alzheimers Stack logo col.png, File:Alive cover.jpg, File:7376-HandbookOfPorphyrinScience.jpg, File:1993habs.jpg, File:1971 Topps Ed Stroud.jpg, File:1970 Topps Super.jpg, File:1970 Topps Greg Gossen.jpg, and File:The Purple Gang.jpg are nominated for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 16:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some are red...

So are you going to create articles for any of these links or are you just hoping someone else will. A templete is not the place to permanently create red links. ^{Carlaude:Talk} 11:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does it make a difference? "Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished." Pais (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jacob Black.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jacob Black.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 02:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1962RenaultRamber.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1962RenaultRamber.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:1955_AMC_Rambler_American_brochure-interior.jpg

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:1962_Rambler_ChampionPlug_MobilEconRun_AD.jpg

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:1966_AMC_Ambassador_DPL_ADV-blue.jpg

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Anti-China_march_logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Anti-China_march_logo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wilber Pan - 007 album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wilber Pan - 007 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halloween Horror Nights VII.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halloween Horror Nights VII.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Animal Crackers poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Animal Crackers poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1964coupRJ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1964coupRJ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halloween Horror Nights VI.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halloween Horror Nights VI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hybrid Theory.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hybrid Theory.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]