User talk:Paianni

Welcome!

Hello, Paspie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page YouTube have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Chris Troutman (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 22 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jolla Tablet page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Jolla Tablet page

Hi, this page is Jolla Tablet product which is important in many more aspects then only a hardware. Jolla tablet is not only about hardware, this is only one of aspects of this. It is related to Jolla, it is containing Sailfish and just the most important aspect is that this is corwdsourced Tablet, and the first one crowdsourced at all. That is why there are no other article like about Jolla - simply before Jolla Tablet there were nothing like this. And among othet that is why this is important. If you look at Jolla (mobile phone) history you will find that I am creator of that page. It has a few sections due to censorship and attempts to remove from Wikipedia a competitive product and company of Jolla. There is nothing to be replicated as that article has been wiped many times, to many. This is not any template. Wikipedia articles are of consensus and upon verifiable sources which provides facts. You should not insist on removing facts, especially when you are not aware of meritum. If an aspect is not important for you it does not mean it is not exist or it is not important. When you claim something is biased or like-advert I am willing to discuss and to change, but it does not mean that your point of view is an obligation, it is a voice in discussion. And I disagree with your "hardware only" approach, this is domain of the manufacturer site, people ought to visit Jolla site for this, not a Wikipedia. Jolla mobile phone is not any obligation or any template also. I appreciate your contribution, but please don't devastate/delete my work as this is wasting my time. We can discuss instead. Crowdfunding is a new approach in development, not used by other companies, especially big rats as M$ or Nokia etc. That is essential for this tablet as it is shaped significantly by this. That is why votes on options or eg countries to be shipped are essential, hence relevant for article page. The OS is what makes this product. Note well the hardware is of the lowest importance of all aspects, as this product is competitive due to Sailfish OS. It could be seatled on any hardware you want or would dream. Aspects around are much more essential to understood the thing. Thx for your attention. Ocexyz (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your recent editing history at Template:Firefox release compatibility shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I created an entry in the talk page to avoid an edit war, but you were not willing to engage with me on the talk page, so our 'discussion' had to take place through reverts, which you instigated and continued at the same pace as me. If retaining the 'Template:Firefox release compatibility' page in the old format is imperative to you, then the same act should also be executed on the Fennec and Firefox contrib equivalents, as otherwise part of the 'Firefox' article, which includes all three, will feel disjointed. Paianni (talk) 17:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...but you were not willing to engage with me on the talk page...

Am I not? —Codename Lisa (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, the signature on my post on the aforementioned talk page was two lines down from where it should have been, and I didn't get a reply notification. Paianni (talk) 18:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of OpenBSD-stable Firefox ESR port

Hello Paianni,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Timeline of OpenBSD-stable Firefox ESR port for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Timeline of OpenBSD-stable Firefox ESR port #2

Hi, I'm Dennis, an admin around here. Someone brought the article to my attention, and at this point, it lacks sufficient context to be an article. Rather than delete it, I would prefer to just move it to your user space and let you work on it and get it up to speed. I can see how it might could be an article, but it is so far away from a notable article now, that if it went to AFD, it wouldn't survive. Please ping me on my user talk page, assuming you agree. Otherwise I'm likely to speedy delete it. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of OpenBSD-stable Firefox ESR port moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Timeline of OpenBSD-stable Firefox ESR port, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Winged Blades^Godric 15:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you didn't see above. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Roger that.~~ Paianni (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no! This t/p message is the result of User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.I came across the article, checked the history and executed the script.Winged Blades^Godric 10:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2016 EU Referendum template

Hi thanks for your comment on the EU referendum articles regarding the template, I have been having trouble as a user keeps insisting that only the standard referendum graph bar is used, I believe it is substandard and I pefer using the template which is as you say in keeping with all the other regional results template. (2A02:C7F:5621:2A00:F0CD:FEE5:EA49:8172 (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paianni. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

M25

Please don't go gossiping on off-wiki sites because somebody reverted your edit. In your instance, your edit summary of "ERROR" was unhelpful (what error, where, and why?) and didn't supply a source contradicting what Wayne Asher's rather excellent "Rings Around London" wrote. I re-read the citation in question and is not entirely clear on reflection that the source states exactly what number the Rickmansworth - Hunton Bridge section originally opened as, and since the causal reader isn't going to mind one way or the other on it, I've removed the detail as superfluous. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 06:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the absense of a source that was the best course of action, but devoid of access to the source I could not have known. Paianni (talk) 09:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was the A405 road#Earlier route. Cabayi (talk) 13:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Opera Mini

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Opera Mini, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Vulkan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vulkan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]