User talk:Page94
East Barnet
[edit]Hi
Are you sure the area just to the north of Oak Hill Park, the B197 joining Cat Hill and the Library, the railway bridge etc do not count as part of East Barnet? Simply south 20:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- The East Barnet / New Barnet 'border' is a bit vague. However having lived in the area all my life I'm certain that East Barnet Road north of the the junction with Brookhill Road is in New Barnet. The address of the health centre near the junction is 'East Barnet Health Centre, East Barnet Road, New Barnet'. Park Road (by the Library) is also New Barnet. Page94 21:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- When i was younger i always thought it was East Barnet. Oh well. Lived local somewhere :) Simply south 21:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Councillor
[edit]For some reason you changed the spelling of Councillor to Councilor on the Brian Coleman page. The proper English spelling is with double L, hence the shortened version Cllr. However the correct spelling remained on the link to the Councillor article. Page94 23:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- D'oh! Sorry about that. It accidentally sneaked onto my spelling corrections list. I should have noticed it too, as the double-L in British English vs the single-L in American English is a fairly common pattern. I've removed it from my list anyhow. Cheers, CmdrObot 12:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Hush The Many
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Hush The Many requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BigDunc (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Hush the Many for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hush the Many until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.