User talk:Paeris

Welcome!

Hello Paeris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --David Johnson [T|C] 21:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dggst.jpg has been listed as a possibly unfree image

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dggst.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--David Johnson [T|C] 21:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I believe US Gov public domain status only applies to works produced by a government employee during their official duties, which I'm thinking this wasn't! If you took the photo, please choose an appropriate license for it from the many options which are available. If you didn't take the photo, you need to cite the source and copyright status. David Johnson [T|C] 21:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I at the A bit confused, but I have selected A of new license as you have told ME tons of DO in such a way. It is good now, yes?
- Yes, that's fine now. Thanks! David Johnson [T|C] 21:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome again

Hi again. I don't want you to feel unwelcome here. But please note that articles are written with some care and much effort is invested to them. I have a difficulty to understand your additions, but perhaps you could add them to talk page first. I will be happy to help you to add any useful info to the articles. On the other hand, never spread hate message around and please take a look at WP:Civil. Thanks! Всього найкращого! Якщо бажаєшь, вiдповiдай українською. Если хочешь, пиши по-русски. --Irpen 23:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

At all cost avoid inflammatory edit summaries. Also, you may end up blocked for attacks. Let's discuss things rather than attack editors. You not unwelcome here. Just learn a little but how Wiki works. --Irpen 23:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may respond at your own page, if you want. --Irpen 23:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As you say lots of care, and I put care in mine and you go and remove without care. This means you must hate Ukraine or me or perhaps others. I do not like racist, you do not like me. You come and say things and make me mean things and then it is your way without anything. This I disagree with, I will write to owner and tell him of such because you break rules. user:Paeris

Dear editor, could you let me know what your native language is? Perhaps we could switch to it if you want. Now, to your edits, are you interested to learn how Wikipedia works? If yes, I will send you some basic links in English or in Russian or in Ukrainian. Under no circumstances you can use the hate talk here. This is the rule number one. As for Lyatoshynsky, please explain at his talk page, what you really wanted to say and we will return it to the article together. --Irpen 23:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have written to owner, he will now sort this out.

I suspect Paeris of vandalism and trollism, and will actively support any official moves regarding it. Contrary to what Irpen has politely said, Paeris already is unwelcome here. Ukrained 23:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How have you the jurisdiction to make such an comment?

Paeris, some of Wikipedia's basic principles are an assumption of good faith and civility. If you are not happy with someone's edits, please try to discuss this with them politely, and hopefully will treat you respectfully in return. Please do not jump to accusations, and since we have to coöperate to get things done in this collaborative encyclopedia, please never call people "racist" or other inflammatory names.

There is no owner of Wikipedia. If you feel that you cannot resolve a dispute through discussion, please consult the dispute resolution process. —Michael Z. 2005-12-19 23:51 Z

Re: Van dal ism

I believe the image was uploaded with the intention of controversial response, or vandalism. If you can tell me a good use for it, and what it's meant to be illustrating, then there's no problem with it. I just don't think there's a need for it. Hedley 00:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I still need to see why you want to use it. What is this illustration? Please don't upload it again until you give a decent reason, or I may have to consider a block. A lot of people are offended by such images. I'm not one of them, but many are. Hedley 00:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I am not against you. Unsourced means that what you have wrote cannot be backed up. If you link to somewhere else on the internet which says what you put, that is a source. You need to do this or the edit cannot be verified. If the edit cannot be verified then it will be reverted. If it is reverted do not add it back, or you may be blocked. Hedley 00:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I understand that. I could go to a book, but on Wikipedia, you have to write in the article which book I can go to. I know it can be annoying to do, but it is so that people don't write things that aren't true, which happens sometimes. Hedley 00:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, that would be ok. But we must be able to find the book on the internet, because sometimes people pretend that books exist when they don't. Hedley 00:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      - Ok, that is good. As long as you don't add more unsourced information, you should be ok. On Wikipedia you should be careful not to annoy other people - I know you don't intend to, but some people are offended by certain images. You should try to ask others before taking actions like that. Also, I recommend you read WP:3RR and Wikipedia:Verifiability, which will help clear things up. Hedley 00:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        If you search on Google for the book, you might be able to find it somewhere. Hedley 00:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        You should really guarantee the source before adding information. It is hard for people to get hold of a Armenian faerie book by Charles Downing, and so you need to prove that it is there. Maybe the book isn't enough. As for images, if people say it is better on Autofellatio, it doesn't mean it is better here. The articles you mean are already illustrated well enough by the drawings, and you should get a lot of other people to agree before adding the image. Hedley 01:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        Yes, that would be good. Hedley 01:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        One person is not consensus. Like I said, images of a sexual nature offend a lot of people, and you'll need a lot of people to agree to adding it. You've reverted three times also, see WP:3RR. I'd recommend getting consensus before adding it again. That'd be best for everybody. Hedley 01:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle, Washington

I'm sorry for not giving you a clearer reason for reverting your contribution earlier. The edit summary doesn't give very much room for explaining. Please continue to contribute! McNeight 00:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert war

If somebody reverts your edits, e.g. on Doggy style, please do not revert them back. Edit wars are harmful. See also the three-revert rule. R adiant _>|< 02:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this.

Please read this: Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images#December_19 and see the conversation where they are talking about the copywrite status of the photo you are claiming you took. Please state whether you took the picture or not there. Thanks --Mistress Selina Kyle 03:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated your photo

I nominated your photo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Dggst

An anonoymous vandal kept removing the image from being listed. Let's hope it stays there, for I see no reason why it shouldn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates

--Anittas 10:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Apperently the same photo you're talking about above is on the verge of being deleted. If you could just say where you got it from, you could likely save it from deletion. karmafist