Hello Pae nor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Just H17:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To continue on the discussion (from here) ... I don't actually have any deep-rooted reason why SG should be in the Relative density article or if they should be in separate articles or not. The reason why I keep reverting it to a redirect is that the present consensus is that they should be in a single article. To properly split an article, present your case using {{Split}}, which will start a formal discussion with several users, and we'll come to a consensus whether it is reasonable to split the article or not. I suggest you present your case in that SG is far more commonly used, and much of the content is directed solely towards SG. RD, on the other hand, is more complicated, and has slightly different rules, or something along those lines.+mwtoews18:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
