User talk:Padmanabhanunnips/Archive-001

Padmanabhanunnips, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Padmanabhanunnips! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Merge discussions

Please do not unilaterally close recently opened merge discussions without consensus. You are free to discuss the issue, as you have done, but the discussion should remain open and the tags kept in place until there is some sort of agreement regarding what should be done. - Sitush (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

You are continuing to make poor, usually unsourced changes to caste-related articles. In this particular topic area, everything is likely to require a reliable source. Please note the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sree Pushpakabrahmana Seva Sangham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sree Pushpakabrahmana Seva Sangham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA 19:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources etc

I have just reverted your massive addition at Pushpaka Brahmin again. Please note that (a) I am not the only person who has reverted you at that article, and (b) you still do not seem to have read the information at WP:RS and WP:V. You have, however, been notified of the special sanctions regime that exists for the caste topic area - if you continue in this vein, you will find yourself either topic banned or blocked entirely from contributing to Wikipedia. - Sitush (talk) 08:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I have now had to revert you again there. You can say "try to find sources" as often as you like but that is your responsibility. Pinging SpacemanSpiff because this is getting a bit much. What is it you do not understand? - Sitush (talk) 07:04, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could I also ask whether you know Wikimankerala (talk · contribs)? The pair of you appear at various articles very close together and seem sometimes to be supporting the same unsouced material. It is odd. - Sitush (talk) 07:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this sanction now applies to you

For persistent disruptive editing concerning Pushpaka Brahmin, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

you have been indefinitely banned from making any edits to caste-related pages

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 07:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Hiding the topic ban notification issued a few days ago by Bishonen does not mean you can make edits such as these. - Sitush (talk) 07:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not hiding the ban. I just wanted to see it in my talk page, so I archived. I didn't delete. I think I have the freedom to do so. Please dont take this as a a personal blame. You are continuously reverting the article to single line article of no use. Instead of keeping the articles as single line articles of no use, it will be better to delete them wholly. However, I tried in all the ways to add sources as you suggested. As you think, I was unable to provide sources in English that can be verified by you in online. But I was trying my level best to improve those articles, at-least to make them a little bit useful to the readers. Please try to be in a more democratic way to people like me. I am not getting your attitude. I am not so experienced in Wikipedia. But I am trying to improve the topics which I am being involved to by adding the facts. But you are deleting the content almost wholly, making it single line article of no use to the readers. I have seen much articles in Wikipedia which are erroneous and factually incorrect. None of them are being attended by you and getting corrected. Even large contents are there without any sources. Even if I am trying to add sources (not so easy, as the topics are not related to the English world) in the articles which I edit, you are reverting it continuously. I am providing correct information and try to expand the article. If you feel them wrong, you can discuss in the talk page na... What should I do..Should I stop and leave the articles to their fate? Please tell me.Padmanabhanunnips (talk) 08:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for WP:TBAN violation placed under WP:GS/Caste. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 07:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Padmanabhanunnips (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21788 was submitted on Jun 11, 2018 08:07:05. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padmanabhanunnips (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to expand the articles. I don't want to see them as articles of two or three lines of no use. If there is any factual errors, please first talk in the talk page before deleting them and blocking me

Decline reason:

The topic ban means that you cannot edit caste-related pages for any reason. You clearly violated this, meaning the block is valid. If you want your caste-related edits to stand, and to not be topic banned, you need to appeal your topic ban as described in your ban notice(either to the administrator that banned you, or to the administrator's noticeboard). As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not understanding what is happening here. Things are too complex to comprehend. Thanks. Better I shall wait unless you remove my block. Thanks. Padmanabhanunnips (talk) 10:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Violating your Topic Ban on caste-related pages.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you're never going to be able to appeal the ban imposed last year if (a) you keep breaching it or (b) if you edit something other than caste articles but make similar mistakes. What do you not understand about the information given at WP:V? Everything you have said in your many edits may have been correct but without reliable sources there is no way that someone else can verify it. Even if you're right, we cannot just take your word for it, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]