User talk:PacificBoy

Welcome!

Hello, PacificBoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TMS63112 18:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Little Mermaid (1989 film)#Limited Issue DVD Cover

About the limited issue DVD cover of Walt Disney's The Little Mermaid, you should put a date of when it went out of print or when The Walt Disney Company stopped making copies of it. --PJ Pete

Grease article

What year was Grease first released on VHS during the 1980s? --PJ Pete

Walt Disney's Aladdin article

Please clean up the part in the "Controversy" headline, the part saying that Abu appears to say "Oh shit!", please edit this phrase, "this is not cut out in the DVD" to "the word "shit" was cut in the 1993 VHS release of the film and when it aired on television". --PJ Pete

William March Edit

Hello, you edited a link on the William March page to redirect to a different author than was intended. You linked to the author Mark Baker, but the author in question is yet another Mark Baker, writer of Nam: The Vietnam War in the Words of the Men and Women Who Fought There. I was only writing to say that I am changing it back, but wanted you to know why....I hate when people change my edits and never start a dialog....I know this is an almost absurd instance to relate, but I think everyone deserves an explanation. Thanks for at least caring in the first place, the William March page has never had any significant edits from anyone other than it's originator. Cheers! - Diarmada 08:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-register

Hello, PacificBoy! You are receiving this notice because the Cleanup Taskforce has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.

For more information see: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet

If you do not re-register here within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the membership list (if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back).

RJFJR 03:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup taskforce

I have added he article M. Night Shyamalan to your desk as a bio about a movie director. Please take a look at it and accept, reject or let me know and I'll reassign it. It may also be ready for closure already. Thank you. RJFJR 03:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Taskforce

Please feel free to assign yourself tasks from the list of unassigned tasks at Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce. Arranging assignments is too much work for me to do by myself. We have a large backlog of unassigned tasks and there is probably something in there that will interest you. RJFJR 22:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beanie Babies

I noticed you have an interest in the page List of Ty Beanie Babies. This page is a work in progress that will take a very long time to complete, given there are so many Beanie Babies. Any help is strongly appreciated.

I have been hoping for there to be a Beanie Baby WikiProject started. Even without one, I am trying to get a team together to expand all the Wikipedia articles pertaining to Beanie Babies. If you would like to participate in any way, please let me know.Xyz7890 (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not interested in Beanie Babies. I landed on one page for some research on an unrelated project and found it rife with errors, which I fixed. PacificBoy 05:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Earl Scheib

One can see you never worked for Scheib. If you can find better paint, name it. Is there any other body shop in the world that would attempt to paint five cars a day without screwing up three? 68.76.120.164 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether I worked for Scheib or not doesn't change the fact that Wikipedia articles need citation. PacificBoy 15:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Nah, they're not the same person, the first ones address starts with 66 and the seconds with 68, which shows that they are infact difrent people, also neither has edited for a while so a block would be pointless, considering the dynamic nature of IPs. About the the vandalism on your page, no problem, a pleasure clearing it up, all the best Spitfire^Tally-ho! 14:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Insight on spraint

		The Fauna Barnstar
		The afd debate about the notability of spraint has been tense with some Wikipedians withholding information on the subject. Thanks for calling these people out on their spraint. Also, the edits you did around the same time on feces, squat toilets, and anal bleaching are also appreciated. I would love to see you combine your knowledge of these things in the Wikipedia mainspace. Please let me know if I could ever help you with anything. Blue Rasberry 23:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Russell, 1st Earl of Bedford

Your edit of 24 April 2011 amending dates of James Russell from (d.1505) to (1455-1509) is unreferenced. Are you able to provide a source? My source contradicts your edit. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Still confused: the 2004 ODNB, vol. 48, p.278 states "James Russell (d.1505/6)". Scott-Thomson, who is more reliable (ODNB falls into howling error of describing him as "of Kingston Russell" which S-T, quoted as source for ODNB, went to great lengths to refute) states his date of death as Nov. 1505 (p.108). I don't know where you found your dates. Furthermore, when making a purportedly corrective edit as you did, you should have left a line ref. Sorry to have to criticise. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Xhosa people

Hi, PacificBoy. In your recent edit of Xhosa people, I notice that you have changed a number of "-ise" words to "-ize". WP:ENGVAR says that an article with a particular association with an English-speaking country should use spellings appropriate to that country. I don't know for sure whether South African English favours "-ise" or "-ize", but this page, for example, uses the word "immunisation", which suggests to me that the "ise" form is customary in South Africa. If this is so, then the part of your edit which alters these words was inappropriate. --ColinFine (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slowly I Turned

I reverted your edit to the "Slowly I Turned" page, and thought I should let you know why. You'd added a "By Whom?" tag after the words "also referred to" in the text "also referred to as, variously, "The Stranger with a Kind Face" by clowns and clowning aficionados, "Niagara Falls" by fans of The Three Stooges, "Pokomoko" or "Bagel Street" by Abbott and Costello lovers, and "Martha" by fans of I Love Lucy."

This tag seems inappropriate because the sentence, as it stands, goes on to answer the "By Whom?" question in detail. If you want to add a "citation needed" tags, that would be more valid.

Before I reverted your edit, I looked at some of your previous edits, and thought that they were all "good calls" - keep up the good work! 86.7.30.217 (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Total Eclipse of the Heart

I'm not really sure why you would tag sections of the article for needing sources while at the same time adding unsourced information, but I've removed the info you added because it's unsourced. Cheers. Doniago (talk) 14:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maugham Bibliography

Hello. I apologise for messing up the bibliography of W. S. Maugham's works. You're of course welcome to fix everything you think fit. I understand my remarks are too personal for this site and I promise I won't touch it anymore; but if I can help with something, let me know. To answer your question "by whom" is the 1951 Heinemann considered definitive, it is by Raymond Toole Stott, Maugham's most industrious bibliographer, whose 1973 revised and expanded edition of "A bibliography of the works of W. Somerset Maugham" is the main source, though certainly not the only one. All the best, Waldstein1981 (talk) 10:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baggy Trousers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colgate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	superb prose improvements on the AC p.! Classicfilmbuff (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A late response to what is a musical?

It's been just over a year since you asked for thoughts about musicals. If you're still interested, I've stirred up the hornet's nest again. Willondon (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PacificBoy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PacificBoy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PacificBoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PacificBoy,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PacificBoy,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PacificBoy,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MoS

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Aretha Franklin, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 09:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing on Wikipedia since 2006, and have only now had this brought to my attention, so I sincerely appreciate your message. As is probably the case with many editors in the US, WP's quotation style looks "off" at first; the need for a whole series of articles explaining its use on WP is probably the best proof of that. That said, I can't seem to find a specific example in the MOS for title quotations such as the ones in question. There are clear examples for quotations, but I can't find one that you'd use in the case of, say, "Chain of Fools". I'm not denying that it's correct for WP, but a separate example might be helpful. If I'm missing it (which is entirely likely), please let me know. Thanks!PacificBoy 21:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pick a Bale of Cotton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peligro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
Update your signature to fix the error.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]