User talk:Pablogrb

Welcome!

Hello, Pablogrb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Yao Ziyuan 05:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Yokokanno.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yokokanno.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

I don't believe this will be deleted, but I don't think it is public domain either. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 20:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notability of Conklin Guitars

I noticed you removed the proposed deletion tags at Conklin Guitars. Why do you think the store is notable enough to merit mention in an encyclopedia? You might review WP:CORP to see if you can justify it with that. Wikipedia's not really a free phone book or advertising service, so I hope that wasn't this article's purpose.--Kchase02 T 05:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I haven't been able to get an adecuate free image that represents the unique craft technique used by Conklin, I'll try to add more information to make the importance clearer. I do have to admit that it's not a famous brand, but it has a reputation for uniqueness that I believe it's worth mentioning

A tag has been placed on Conklin Guitars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —P ilotguy (ptt) 02:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Gap9551. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Proxima Centauri b have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gap9551 (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Conklin Guitars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conklin Guitars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conklin Guitars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 22:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]