User talk:Pablo323
July 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adam Campbell (actor), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-Andrew c [talk] 00:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
gfg
Hello,
I am curious about this edit that you made to De Clarke. There is no reason to add a hangon tag to that article, as {{hangon}} is only for use on articles that are up for speedy deletion. Did you mean to put a CSD tag on it instead? Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC).
- The tag you used, {{hangon}}, was not the correct tag to use. Please read Wikipedia:Deletion policy, which talks about the many ways that articles can be deleted here on English Wikipedia. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC).
Personal attacks
[edit]Wikipedia's civility policy applies even when warning vandals; this edit is entirely unacceptable. If you persist in abusing other users, even vandals, you'll be blocked from editing. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 21:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted that merge (just now, but better late than never). You should have opposed the merger on Talk:American Video Entertainment (in which no one bothered to participate, which I blame myself for not getting wider input, say, from WT:VG) or brought it up on that talk page. Even though being WP:BOLD is encouraged, boldly undoing reverts can lead to revert-warring, which no one wants. I'll let it go, but next time you should try to use the talk pages when discussing redirects or reversions thereof. I'm fairly reasonable and is happy to discuss whenever I can. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Your edits to Claudia Christian
[edit]Hello, there. When editing articles, please keep in mind that movie titles are written in italics per the Manual of Style. Have a nice day, Rosenknospe (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
I was not sure what you wanted done with Los Abuelos de la Nada. Is it supposed to be a redirect to Miguel Abuelo? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Klov small logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Klov small logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
[edit] Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Belladonna (person) a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Skomorokh, barbarian 02:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Pablo323. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)