User talk:PMCALIFNH

Welcome!

Hi PMCALIFNH! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Keith Francis (Track and Field Athlete), from its old location at User:PMCALIFNH/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 02:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

New message from Rich Smith

Hello, PMCALIFNH. You have new messages at Rich Smith's talk page.
Message added 13:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Francis (athlete) has been accepted

Keith Francis (athlete), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Number of whaleships in American fleet

During the peak year of the American whaling trade, 1846, there were only 736 vessels (Scammon, 1874, p. 243). The entire world's whaling fleet numbered roughly 1,000 at that time. 2,700 must refer to something else. ST1849 (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

OMG I am so sorry - I will investigate this an correct today! Thank you so much for catching this!--PMCALIFNH (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

I have corrected this - your number is correct. As the industry spanned over 150 years and the lifetime of each ship was limited (not counting lost without a trace, known wrecks and of course the toll of the South during the Civil war) I believe that number may well be the total number of ships ever in the fishery over its entire history - but "I ain't counting them"! thamks again for this important catch!!! --PMCALIFNH (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

The mystic seaport museum uses the number 2,700 to estimate the total number of whalers ever built. I have updated the reference to the corrected verbiage and distinction between the two numbers, and inserted the proper citation, which was not correct in the prior version. Thanks again for your important feedback!. --PMCALIFNH (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)