User talk:PJ67000

Hello, PJ67000, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

PJ67000, good luck, and have fun. PamD 15:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PamD 15:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages, and perhaps COI

Disambiguation pages like Rasmus only include entries for topics which have Wikipedia articles or are mentioned in Wikipedia articles: every entry must include one blue link which will help the reader find out about the topic. I've removed your addition of P.J. Vanston's novel. If by any chance you are the author yourself, please read WP:COI about "Conflict of interest" and take note that you should not be editing about your own works. Thanks. PamD 15:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go again: do not try to add the novel to the disambiguation page until there is a Wikipedia article about the novel or the author. That is how disambiguation pages work. Thanks. PamD 17:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PJ67000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was abused by Wiki editor PamD. I was blocked after I replied to a RUDE AND ABUSIVE message left for me from PamD - I don't take that crap from anyone, Some snide comment "here we go again" is abuse of me, an author, by someone who is just a volunteer on a free website. As I said, I don't take bullying or crap from anyone, on here or anywhere else. LEARN SOME MANNERS and treat people with RESPECT on Wiki PJ67000 (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You only need one unblock request, so I have merged the two - and you should not place unblock requests inside headings. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A couple of extra observations...
It is not rude and abusive to explain the error you were making on a disambiguation page - a disambiguation page lists articles associated with its title, and if there's no article to associate with an entry then it should not be there.
PamD might be just a volunteer on a free website, but so are you (and so am I). Your also being an author gives you no special status and does not allow you to add content to Wikipedia contrary to established policy.
If you want to make a new unblock request, you should address your own behaviour and not blame others for simply correcting your errors and explaining Wikipedia policy to you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"HERE WE GO AGAIN" is an abusive snide UNPROFESSIONAL comment from some Wiki nobody

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PJ67000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been abused and insulted by some noting on Wiki which says it all, Starting a comment 'HERE WE GO AGAIN' IS ABUSE and if you cannot see that Zebedee saddo, then go fuck yourself with your spring! GET A LIFE, wankers - you Wiki twats have NO manners. Learn some. 'HERE WE GO AGAON' (copied anyway from President Reagan presidential debate but used by a sad spinster in northern England. Oh dear... reasonPJ67000 (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. If you have a change of attitude and decide to stop the personal attacks, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are escalating your abuse, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. The admin who reviews your unblock request is welcome to reinstate that ability if they wish. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:22, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Making personal attacks won't help you with getting unblocked. Further, your edits here and otherwhere show that You only come to force your own special opinion. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 10:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]