User talk:PGoldingBF

May 2022

Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paul Golding without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Suonii180 (talk) 20:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It states that Wikipedia policy is: "This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard."

This claim that Paul Golding was in the "National Front" is libellous and completely untrue. Paul Golding was in the BNP and never the National Front. Paul got involved in politics in 1999 and immediately joined the BNP. This claim needs to be removed. PGoldingBF (talk) 20:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Under the heading entitled "alleged sex attack", you keep removing the fact that this allegation was given a "no further action" by the police even though it clearly states this in the Daily Mail, a mainstream source:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5135669/British-leader-faces-sexual-assault-investigation.html

If it is being stated by a mainstream source, why do you keep removing this information? Not to mention that the woman in question was 27 - this is hardly "under the age of consent"! Can you explain why the libellous claim that the alleged victim was "under the age of consent" is still in there? Is there a reference for that claim? If not, remove. PGoldingBF (talk) 21:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the Daily Mail link above, it says of the alleged victim: "A 25-year-old woman had been staying at a hotel on Grains bar. Enquiries are ongoing to establish the full circumstances around this incident." PGoldingBF (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Mail has been discussed multiple times and the consensus for several years is that Wikipedia considers it to be an unreliable source. Therefore content citing it as a source will be rejected. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Golding, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 20:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, PGoldingBF, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username.

If you choose to keep your current username, please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org including your real name and your Wikipedia username to receive instructions from our volunteer response team about account verification. Please do not send documentation without being requested to do so.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.

Cullen328 (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]