User talk:PFlores3

Image copyright problem with Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.back.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.back.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected incorrect licences on book covers

Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.JPG, Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG, and Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.back.JPG are all non-free book covers protected under copyright. Their use on Wikipedia is allowed but only on the article of their book. It is critical that the licensing information be corrrect. I have corrected the license to read: {{Non-free book cover}} on all 3 images. If the article is ever removed from Wikipedia, these images will also be removed as non-free images without a fair-use reason. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2 of 3 non-free book cover images removed

I removed this image from Encyclopedia Rizaliana. It is customary to have only 1 copyrighted book cover for a book. Back-covers are not typically used. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.back.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.back.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Fadul

If you look at this you can see that an IP added the deletion tag. I then declined to delete the article and removed removed the tag. The conflict of interest arose because the article was created by User:Fadulj who has name appears very similar to the subject. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Child prodigies

Hi, in response to your message, please be aware that failing to meet the definition is only one reason for removal, and the edits you refer to may not be for that reason. Other frequently deleted entries are due to unsourced entries, improperly sourced entries (linking to an article that does not specifically state that the subject is a child prodigy), or entries using a self-promotional website as their source. If I deleted an entry and you believe that none of these apply, please let me know which one, and we can discuss it. A subject may in fact be a child prodigy, but without including the necessary information, it will be removed from the list. Freqsh0 (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fadulj. Thank you. -Freqsh0 (talk) 19:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocked re sockpuppetry concerns

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

re Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets#User:Fadulj. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Acquired Death Aversion Deficiency syndrome

I have nominated Acquired Death Aversion Deficiency syndrome, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquired Death Aversion Deficiency syndrome. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 12:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Encyclopedia.Rizaliana.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 17:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Encyclopeida.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Encyclopeida.Rizaliana.Student.front.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Encyclopedia Rizaliana

The article Encyclopedia Rizaliana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book, published on an on-demand service (Lulu)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bedivere (talk) 02:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Encyclopedia Rizaliana.Student Edition.front cover.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Encyclopedia Rizaliana.Student Edition.front cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]