User talk:PESO44

peso44

In response to your feedback

If you see a edit reverted that you don't agree with, you can leave a comment on that user's talk page asking about it, or, if you'd prefer, get in touch with me directly at my talk page and I'll try to help you. :)

Theopolisme _TALK 06:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Al Arabiya because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 04:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Al Arabiya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Al Arabiya was changed by PESO44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918152 on 2012-11-05T17:57:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your complaint

I understand that you don't appreciate having your edits removed. However, your claim that the Saudi ruling family is "money hungry" is a violation of WP:NPOV and Eric was therefore right to remove it. Furthermore, calling Eric an idiot as you did here is a personal attack and is punishable as such. AutomaticStrikeout 19:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This your last warning. If you continue to attack other editors, as you did here, I will take steps to have the situation handled appropriately. AutomaticStrikeout 19:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're just senseless and clueless making false accuses.--PESO44 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Bagumba (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Al Arabiya

Please do not mark edits as minor unless they are truly minor and could not possibly be the source of dispute. Reverting an edit is virtually never minor (unless reverting clear vandalism). As for the reversion itself, the content is clearly a violation of POV. Even if the comment were to be qualified, the source fails WP:RS and is itself a violation of NPOV to include in the article. Glaucus (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PESO44. You have new messages at Glaucus's talk page.
Message added 21:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Glaucus (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Al Arabiya

Since you insist on continuing to re-insert the content, I have taken the matter here. AutomaticStrikeout 00:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for POV such as [1] and his first three edits look like this isn't the first time he has been here. Current behavior is bad enough that I don't see the point in trying to connect the dots.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]