User talk:PD2D2

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

PD2D2, good luck, and have fun. PamD 14:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PamD 14:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tong Trithara. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New to Wiki.. how do I fix information to comply and still have the information available.

Need guidance...New to Wiki...

I'm new to this and perhaps need some help. I'm updating a friend's bio to include his philanthropy endeavors, but KATMAKROFAN keeps reverting the info, flagging it as spam then submitted the page for deletion!!! What I'm I doing wrong? I've removed links, rephrased some text in to add Tong Trithara's humanitarian contributions and still KATMAKROFAN keeps threatening that it's spam!!!

I don't mind re-edits to help make my updates comply but Deleting my contributions isn't helpful. Please help me fix the info instead of submitting it for deletion. Many Thanks PDeditorial (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, PD2D2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Tong Trithara, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. You should not be editing an article about your friend. If he is truly Notable, in Wikipedia terms, other editors will write about him with reliable independent published sources. You have what is called a "Conflict of Interest" and should not edit that article. PamD 14:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PD2D2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PD2D2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Unpaid Contributions

In reference to above statements and posts about disclosures, my edits/contributions are unpaid, pro bono updates done at leisure and on my own time based on information I read in print publications and/or articles I find through google searches from established print/online publishers and archives. I obviously lack Wiki backend knowledge, but that does not mean my informational contributions lack merit. PD2D2 (talk) 18:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I read your comments at the AfD discussion and I hope this doesn't deter you from further WP editing. The problem is that there's nothing that shows he has significant independent coverage. Coverage from local papers is often not considered because, most of the time, it's the subject either submitting an article or being interviewed with no further checking done by the reporter. That means the source can't be considered independent of the subject. I would recommend that you carefully read WP:GNG and WP:RS to see what is generally required of articles. If you're going to focus on martial arts topics, then reading WP:MANOTE would also be helpful. Creating your first WP article can be tough, but there are lots of editors who are willing to help you if you ask them. Papaursa (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]