User talk:PDM888

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Allan Peiper has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Allan Peiper was changed by PDM888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914492 on 2018-01-01T15:56:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, PDM888. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the links above. It should be clear to you by now that your version of that article (which has some really obvious, technical flaws as well) is not in agreement with our policies and guidelines. I hope you will take them into account in future work on the article, since otherwise we probably have no choice but to block you. Drmies (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and paid editing

Hi: if you have any questions for me, please address them on-wiki unless there are privacy concerns. I tagged an image you uploaded on Commons as a copyright violation because it was one: you were not the creator of the work, and thus you don't have the right to release it under a free license. If you know the person who does own the copyright, you can use this tool to release the license the image as a compatible license.

Additionally, if you have a connection to the subject you should declare it per WP:COI. On top of that, if you have received compensation or expect to receive compensation for your actions on Wikipedia, you must declare them per our paid contribution disclosure policy. Note that disclosure is not enough: editors must also comply with the policies and guidelines of the English Wikipedia. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I hate to bother you, but I do have a few followups, and unfortunately if you do not explain them, we might have to block. File:Allan.Peiper.AUS Ballarat 2009.jpg, which you uploaded on Commons you claim to be your own work. Now, I can't find another version of it on the internet, but it looks like it was an image of him taken in private while he was doing some event. This to me suggests one of two things: it is either a copyright violation that you did not take, so it needs to be marked as such on Commons, or you know him either personally or professionally and took the picture yourself and uploaded it. If you are his employee or contractor, it might also be copyright even then if you took it yourself, depending on your agreement. Finally, you really do need to disclose what your relationship is to Mr. Peiper and if he or someone else has paid you to edit his article. Please do not edit again until you have done so. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tony. I took a lot of photos - at a championship cycle race (Australia) in Ballarat in 2009. I have not used that picture (of Allan Peiper) anywhere online. I have used and uploaded many from that race several years ago, of riders from that same race see link https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=adam+hansen&dcr=0&tbm=isch&source=lnt&tbs=sur:fc&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6vMOTurzYAhWhF8AKHf9uCqgQpwUIHw&biw=1366&bih=613&dpr=1#imgrc=A35hNMFqlMs26M: I own some bicycle brands (squadra / omerta / pdm / outback / flashingpedals / as trade marks also in several countries. The image of Allan, is from 2009, and I used the copyright use BMC AG approved image (you've suggested is in breach, etc) so I simply added my own photo, albeit out of date, but more relevant, than the image that's used elsewhere. Allan, nor BMC AG are employed by me, nor am I employed by them. If the allegations are from yourself, I'd expect a greater degree of common sense. No one has paid me to do anything. I know Allan well enough to say hello. He is, or was, a famous cyclist, so yes, I was a fan of his ability, hence the photo taking. I also photographed the team riders he was working with, that day. PDM888 (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC) I forgot to mention, that I often upload my images if they are of reasonable quality, to wikipedia for any use by others.[reply]

Perfect. Thank you for clarifying. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You are involved in an edit war on Alan Peiper. You made changes that were then reverted. Per Wikipedia's BRD model, you should discuss any further changes you wish to make. Since you have not been previously informed of this rule, I will assume that you are not aware that Wikipedia has a three-revert rule: if you revert edits of other users more than three times in a 24 hour period, you may be blocked to prevent further disruption. I will warn you now: make no further reverts to this page or you will likely find yourself blocked. Discuss the changes you want on the talk page. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't email me with questions that can be handled on-wiki. You may be disappointed, but you are editing against the judgment of three, maybe four editors. Drmies (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not involved in any edit war, as you describe. A simple polite "message" to a new person, would have helped and been sufficient. My annoyance, was borne out of "work in progress" which you kindly explained, could be solved by work elsewhere (sandbox). As a new person, albeit, a previous wiki person (PDM88) I'd simply forgotten about. It appears "the rules" are instigated as appropriate, by others with admin power, which is fine. It's how the manner, in which it is unleashed, and wielded, which, is what, I would question. You mention the judgement of three maybe four editors, in which i refer to the above point..... I will not email you again. I'm easy going, and I will ensure, that, I give no reason to argue, factually, or the opportunity, for others to act in the manner, I have encountered, so far. Today's a new day..... PDM888 (talk) 09:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Peiper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I've changed the links to the correct person wikipedia pages. PDM888 (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Allan Peiper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bailleul and Agno

Peter Brotherton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Essendon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. Corrected errors. PDM888 (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Peiper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rochefort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. fixed. PDM888 (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Peiper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Peiper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Andersen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. amended PDM888 (talk) 11:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Peiper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shannon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

corrected thank you PDM888 (talk) 10:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan Peiper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rochefort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

corrected, thank you PDM888 (talk) 09:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citing books

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

a question regarding the sources of material for verification of edits, re cycling related pages, etc. I have found that many online databases, are not so accurate. I have some published volumes of cycling teams, riders, and races, that span the years between 1972-2008. They are UCI published and endorsed volumes. I have not found these listed when I've tried inputting the ISBN numbers, searching for a published book reference. The only book links I have found, re these volumes, are of a US commercial online business, and I'd rather not promote or incur the wrath of wiki keyboard ninja warriors!

Any suggestions or thoughts? PDM888 (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, locating them in an online database would be ideal, but physical books can be cited using Template:cite book. What are the bibliographic details of the volumes? title(s), publisher name, publication date(s), ISBN numbers? Let me know if you have further questions. Scottyoak2 (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information that you sent to me regarding the books. I was only able to find them at bol.com but I you could cite them in a non-promotional way like this:

{{cite book
 |last1=Harens
 |first1=Herman
 |author-link1=
 |date=
 |chapter=
 |title=Wieler Jaarboek 
 |trans-title=Wheeler Yearbook
 |url=https://www.bol.com/nl/p/wieler-jaarboek/1001004002059328/
 |type=Paperback
 |series=
 |language=Dutch
 |volume=2003-2004
 |edition=19th edition
 |location=
 |publisher=Uitgeverij Elmar
 |publication-date=March 2004
 |page=
 |pages=
 |isbn=978-90-389-1494-7
 |access-date=9 April 2018
}}

I've shown how to use the citation as an inline reference here. If any editors have issue, simply remove the URL from the citation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Scottyoak2 (talk) 11:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PDM888. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1985 Paris–Nice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fagor (cycling team) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NEVENT and cite independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:PDM888/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:PDM888/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 19:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PDM888! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 19:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]