User talk:P.greenlink/Archive 1

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at One Piece (season 20). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Your edits appear to be in good faith. However, you have violated WP:3RR. Bmf 051 (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Hey, wanna talk with whatever account you're using? Join with random name here [1]. Avdald (talk) 20:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I don't think so. Pissedgreenlink (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so you don't want to talk? Why is that, are you afraid? Then please don't complain in the future if you are the one refusing to talk. The link I send you is just an online chat which doesn't require any account, it's just to talk faster. Avdald (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, more or less I just don't see why should I use another site entirely to talk about an issue that is on this site. I mean, that's what the talk pages are here for right? Pissedgreenlink (talk) 21:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok if you want to talk here, let's go then, what's wrong with my edits? Avdald (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak for other people but I thought it was an unspoken agreement that most of it was fine how it. And didn't really see why it was deemed need to change. As for why SpectresWrath reverted it you'd have to ask them. Though I do admit it is partially my fault for not starting a talk article on it, but talking doesn't always work with people who are so adamant like "no, it should be this way because I said so". Pissedgreenlink (talk) 21:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm very glad to know that nothing is wrong with my edits, in the future please refrain from reverting contributions about topics you have no knowledge or interest on, it was a pleasure talking to you. Avdald (talk) 22:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ya you do the same. Pissedgreenlink (talk) 22:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pissedgreenlink, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --🐦DrWho42 (👻) 15:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Noticeboard report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jp×g 05:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Pissedgreenlink, contains the word "pissed".

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.

-- The Anome (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

P.greenlink (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

p.greenlink (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Accept reason:

I have renamed your account and will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you send warning to IP

Hello, I noticed you've been undoing edits from an IP on List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters. Why are you not sending them warnings so they know they're making mistake? I've sent the IP user two levels of warning uptil now. But, since you're undoing the edits, I think it's better if you send warnings to them. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 02:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know I really should do being that. But I think the main reason why I don't is because I don't have such and such template on demand when I need it. That and a lot of the time when I do revert they often tell me why. P.greenlink (talk) 02:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you use Twinkle? You wouldn't have to remember the Templates. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 06:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What?P.greenlink (talk) 06:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This gadget Twinkle. You can enable it in your preferences. See the page for more information. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 06:33, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. P.greenlink (talk) 08:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rude Ip user

I'll be back in the morning you stupid f*cking robot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:D880:3930:0:0:0:9852 (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]