User talk:Oyster24

Hello, Oyster24. You have new messages at Talk:Gethin Jones.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome!

Hello, Oyster24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 22:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Mead Reviews

I preferred to quote the reviews - and I'd only had time to check the Independent. I've put the Mail's review up too, not. The wiki-prefects tend to object to unsubstantiated generalities - but I left your para in. I'll replace it when I've got the rest of the dailies and the Standard - oh yes, and the Stage (that's next Wednesday, unless they post review at thestage.co.uk before publishing them, which doesn't seem likely)

But thanks for your help. Any editing is welcome. And Talk, please, if you think my Loppyness is showing. Academe 11:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No that's fine. I could have put more reviews on but my son came round and I had to stop. They have links to all the reviews on Digital Spy forums. Don't worry about your Loppyness! Replace my paragraph when you get round to it.Oyster24 21:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will Young photo

Hi, it's probably easier if I direct you to Wikipedia:Uploading images for the guidelines on what to do. I hope it is helpful. Good luck. — AnemoneProjectors (?) 16:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly Come Dancing

I've put in a request on WP:RPP for the page semi-protecting following the constant vandalism (not just of results!) ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 23:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great, just what we want. Thanks very much. The people on Digital Spy are panicking! Oyster24 (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Why are the people at Digital Spy panicking? Don't tell me that they rely on Wikipedia for Strictly results *rolls eyes* ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 23:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were until I put them right! (More eye rolling!). They are panicking because they cannot get their fix of the results because there aren't any of their friends at the show as it is in a smaller studio because of Children in Need being in the big one!Oyster24 (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess they want to be the first to know the results :P. As long as they aren't the ones adding the results here... ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 23:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think whoever did it does go onto DS but is not necessarily a SCD fan. Some other stupid person. Now DS is down - could it be the BBC getting in on the act?Oyster24 (talk) 06:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, previous weeks it has been more correct, and done at approximately the time the result would have been announced in the studio, which suggests that there were at the recording of SCD. I don't think the BBC would deliberately spoil the show by putting the result here, but it could happen. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 09:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant is that may be the BBC had complained about the results being on DS and asked them to suspend the forums until the results had come in. However it is OK now.Oyster24 (talk) 14:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Well, as mentioned mentioned on the talk page, it is the BBC's fault really for moving the results show to a Sunday evening, and expecting everyone to keep quiet until then. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 14:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly my pointOyster24 (talk) 14:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to "Gethin Jones": references

Hi, thanks for your recent edits to "Gethin Jones". Following from our conversation on the article's talk page, can I urge you to remember to add references to reliable sources such as newspaper websites to show where you obtained the information from? Have a look at the edits I've made to see how to insert footnotes. If you're still unsure, just put the reference at the end of the information that you've added, like this:

This is the information.<ref>http://www.reliablesource.co.uk</ref>

Another editor will come along and put it in the right format. If you'd like to discuss the matter further, let's do so on the article's talk page. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 23:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lee Mead.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lee Mead.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will Young

Just an FYI re: this edit - websites don't distinguish between upper- and lower-case letters: www.willyoung.co.uk and www.WillYoung.co.uk will both work. Wikipedia editors quite frequently convert from lower-case to "CamelCase" to make URLs (web addresses) easier to read and remember.

That said, there's nowt wrong with your edit! I just thought you might find this useful.

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 16:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll leave it like that but it doesn't seem right to me. It looks very odd! We have got used to reading website addresses in lower case. Oyster24 (talk) 06:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joe McElderry

Hi, I can't find any reason why you should not be able to edit this article, did you get a message to the effect? Graham. Graham Colm ^Talk 20:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I will have another go. Oyster24 (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Oyster24. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]