User talk:Ownyouridea

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Solomon Sandridge has been accepted

John Solomon Sandridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Oo7565 (talk) 05:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Numinousneoism

The article Numinousneoism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. Unsourced. Google searches find very little and nothing of substance to back up claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Numinousneoism Art for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Numinousneoism Art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numinousneoism Art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Papa-Cause

Hello, Ownyouridea,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Papa-Cause should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papa-Cause .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with . And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 06:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Day {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. No worries. Ownyouridea (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)ownyouridea[reply]