User talk:OwnstheBeagles

OwnstheBeagles, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi OwnstheBeagles! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome OwnstheBeagles!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,252,462 registered editors!

Hello, OwnstheBeagles. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

HammahBanana

I'd be quite happy if you did not comment on things that I changed — Preceding unsigned comment added by HammahBanana (talk • contribs) 00:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you need help with your edits, you can always look at WP:HELPDESK! But blanking large sections in order to simplify them will usually gain the attention of at least one editor. OwnstheBeagles (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. You may also want to check out WP:Twinkle. :) S0091 (talk) 22:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll have a look at that. <3 OwnstheBeagles (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime! Thanks for you contributions. S0091 (talk) 22:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Red Phoenix. An edit you recently made to Financial crisis of 2007–2008 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Red Phoenix ^talk 01:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! OwnstheBeagles (talk) 01:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, yours was a good edit. Huggle malfunctioned on me because you got the revert exactly a second before I did. I have self-reverted. Red Phoenix ^talk 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh gosh, no apologies necessary. <3 I'm fairly new to the reverting vandalism thing, it's no big deal. :D OwnstheBeagles (talk) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

???

	???
	Why are you reporting me? It has nothing to do with my philosophy. It is totally misleading and should not be front and center of this article. I am a life long Democrat and I just want the information out there to be accurate. Mikesmith2369892 (talk) 05:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're blanking things with (as far as I can tell) proper citation without so much as going into the article talk page to explain how the cited sources are wrong, or to provide better ones. Do you have better, alternative sources that disprove what the article is saying? Did he not vote in those ways, at those times? OwnstheBeagles (talk) 05:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I noticed you have taken up some anti-vandalism work. Good show. Be aware, it can be addicting. Ifnord (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! You're right, it is addicting. <3 OwnstheBeagles (talk) 22:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Hey there. I hit the revert button RIGHT after you reverted the vandalism. My sincerest apologies for this. Plandu (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it happens to everyone! <3 Can I take off the warning? XD OwnstheBeagles (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for fighting vandalism!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For doing the good work that keeps Wikipedia great and safe from corrupt additions! Aviartm (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! <3 OwnstheBeagles (talk) 00:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

I know you have adorable dogs but....

Alpha⁴⁶¹⁵ _{(talk to me)} 18:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do have adorable dogs, but also a cat or a few, so thank you! <3 OwnstheBeagles (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]