User talk:Ownslaver

November 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 15:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with your own perception, but you need to understand my conditional statement and eventually this article. Don't even slay any typical reference Ownslaver (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 15:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How does this even make a sensible commitment for you?are you really fading my eternity thats so rude of you @Cremastra Ownslaver (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and the matter of the fact is, it don't even concentrate the quotation, which really make more sense right I personally don't have any problem with this article, but it should obscure the context in rightful manner without favouring anybody side @Cremastra Ownslaver (talk) 16:06, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Truthfindervert per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 19:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]