Jump to content

User talk:Owenmadison

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Owenmadison, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Lexein (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Stern

[edit]

Just a heads-up - the edits you're making at Howard Stern, which you comment as FACT, should be supported by citations of reliable sources. The article has many citations already; one of them very likely supports the edits you're making. You can re-use an existing named reference like so: <ref name="NameGoesHere" />. Don't be bashful about asking for help on the article's Talk page, or at WP:IRC (here) either. --Lexein (talk) 18:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Thank you for your suggestion regarding The Moody Blues. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.

The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Mlpearc powwow 18:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Sam Phillips worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Puffin Let's talk! 11:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up

[edit]

Hey Owen,

Just so you know, this edit really should be avoided if possible, as it just litters the text with templates and is mildly disruptive. A simple template at the end of each paragraph (or even at the top of the section for that matter) would suffice. Have a good day! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:46, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Cave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawless (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Suicidal Tendencies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elvis Costello discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MCA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rehab Doll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Express Yourself (Madonna song). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Stop adding fact tags to the lead sections of articles that have perfectly good references for those facts in the article body. Binksternet (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Owenmadison (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)== Madonna/Express Yourself ==[reply]

Binksternet removed my edits, edits that were asking for references. The first couple of paragraphs consisted largely of fan gushing. Those paragraphs also contained the writer's opinions on, for instance, what the song means. Who cares what one fan thinks? I'm looking for facts, not fan gushing. If those paragraphs have documentation later in the article, then I would seriously suggest moving them up.

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Owenmadison. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Owenmadison. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Owenmadison. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Costello

[edit]

Hello again

The Elvis Costello discography page continues to list For the Stars as an Elvis Costello album. Although it is credited to Anne Sofie Von Otter Meets Elvis Costello, it is simply a Von Otter album produced by Elvis. He wrote or co-wrote 8 of the 14 songs, many of which were previously recorded by Elvis. He plays on 2 songs and contributes vocals to 6. If you're going to include this album, why not Now Ain't the Time for Your Tears by Wendy James, for which Elvis wrote or co-wrote all the songs. Using Elvis' name may have been good for marketing purposes, but For the Stars is no more an Elvis album than The Sweetest Punch or Terror and Magnificence.


Hello

I was trying to move For the Stars to the "Albums which credit Costello as a featured artist" section. I clearly messed up. It has been a while since I edited. I apologize.

For the Stars was produced by Elvis, and he plays on some tunes and sings on 2 (I believe). The Annie Meets Elvis credit was probably done for promotional reasons, although this is just a guess.

If an Elvis fan were to seek out this record, they would be buying an Anne Sofie Von Otter album.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Owenmadison&oldid=1091297428"