User talk:Owen998

Thank you for experimenting with the page Jimbo Wales on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — $PЯINGrαgђ 02:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Owen Robson. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 01:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User:Springeragh

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User:Springeragh. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Will ^{(is it can be time for messages now plz?)} 03:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Owen Robson, to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Slp1 03:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion

The page I deleted, Owen Robson, read, in its entirety, "Owen Robson is a person." That didn't assert notability. See WP:BIO.

If you want to write about yourself, you can use your user page. NawlinWiki 11:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skythrust

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Skythrust, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — iridescenti (talk to me!) 11:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Skythrust

I've nominated Skythrust, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Skythrust satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skythrust and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Skythrust during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve Apostles

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Twelve Apostles, you will be blocked from editing. Melburnian 02:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]