User talk:Owain the 1st
Are you listening?
[edit]I placed you on notice of discretionary sanctions a few days ago, and gave you some routine advice. You removed that message without responding. User:Cptnono yesterday tried to open a discussion about an edit of yours that he found problematic. You removed that message without responding. When are you going to start engaging with your peers when they have a problem with your editing, fellow editors and uninvolved administrators alike? AGK [•] 11:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC) oh the Israelis know they commit even genetic genocide against themselves, Inez Deborah Emilia Altar´s brain tissue because it is of the Mongols or Mongols of Israel and Huns of European Union and Mongols and their Supreme Leader descendants and 800 year regrown tissue of Supreme Leader — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.158.25.130 (talk) 02:48, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Cptnono is hounding me.Are you going to do anything about that? Also I have done nothing wrong so I do not see what you are going on about frankly.There is no law on here that says I have to respond to everyone who puts something on my talk page.Cptnono has been on my case from virtually the first day I came on this site.This is the 4th time he has reported me, sure seems strange but I know why he is doing it, it is because I post facts about the Israelis and he does not like that.Funny how he went running to you and not some other admin????Owain the 1st (talk) 11:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Thank you for responding. You actually are obliged to not treat your talkpage like a whiteboard that you wipe clean when it suits you, and to respond to reasonable grievances about your behaviour. In what way is Cptnono hounding me? Could you please link to edits of his that demonstrate this hounding? Thanks, AGK [•] 11:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes I can although it will take me some time to find them all but I will give it a go for sure. Is there a specific rule that says I cannot wipe my talk page? Owain the 1st (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Heavens knows what you mean by "Funny how he went running to you and not some other admin????", but remarks like that are entirely inappropriate. Calm down. AGK [•] 11:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- WP:UP#CMT states that you are free to remove messages if you want to, but that that will be taken as evidence that you have read the warning, and that subsequent disruption will be handled as if you have been already warned.
I placed you on-notice of discretionary sanctions a couple of days ago, but have just realised that you have already been placed on notice. Please therefore understand that, if you behave disruptively again in the Israel-Palestine topic area, you will be subject to sanction. This is a contested and controversial topic area, and disruptive editing is wholly unhelpful. Thank you. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further guidance. AGK [•] 11:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I joined this site on the 4th April I believe but did not do that much editing.Then not knowing any better I got into an edit war with a pro Israeli editor who was just deleting factual stuff I put up again and again, page after page so I started to revert it back and Cptnono then came in on and reported me [1].He did not bother to report the pro Israeli editor who was basically just vandalising articles, the result of that report was that the other editor got banned.Then on the 1st of June he started to hound me seriously [2][3][4] and even when told not to talk about a subject that the section of the page was not about he continued anyway[5][6][7][8][9][10]and then he reported me again [11][12][13]that did not work out for him as the other editors did not agree with him so off he went yet again and reported me on another board [14]and then today he is guess what? reporting me yet again [15].Over this same period he was chasing me over my userpage and 2 other article talk pages [16] and [17].
Of course you would have already seen some of this as I posted it as my statement in the case against me.Possibly you did not even bother to read it. Owain the 1st (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Could you please not address me in an unprofessional way? It is unhelpful and unnecessary. AGK [•] 14:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I see nothing wrong with the way I have addressed you at all. I see you never even commented on my links to cptnono hounding me. There seems to be a lot of talk on this board that you are biased in favour of the Israelis, seems to be everywhere and I have to say I agree with that opinion.Owain the 1st (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry that you think that I am biased, but I have already refuted similar allegations, and would encourage you to read the discussion in my talk page archives. There is more than one perspective, and you should consider mine as well as those of this "board" you speak of. I do not see how you can think that alleging that I "did not bother to read" your statement is at all acceptable. In every comment to me here, you have made unsubstantiated generalisations about my motives or biases, and it is unprofessional. Lastly, as it clearly did not occur to you, I would point out that I did read your comments about Cptnono, but I am looking into them. It will take a while to consider your allegations, and it would be more helpful if you were patient with me, and not grossly unfriendly. YMMV. Regards, AGK [•] 20:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks.Owain the 1st (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Update: Still reviewing, and looking into background. Don't have copious wikitime at the moment, but I am looking into your allegations. Regards, AGK [•] 23:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- thanksOwain the 1st (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- AGK is the admin who has banned Nableezy on pathetic grounds and for the same reason, to stop any Israel based article from reflecting what's in the sources. But then you probably know that. 94.116.69.172 (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- IP - wrong, and wrong. AGK [•] 11:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- AGK is the admin who has banned Nableezy on pathetic grounds and for the same reason, to stop any Israel based article from reflecting what's in the sources. But then you probably know that. 94.116.69.172 (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- thanksOwain the 1st (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Update: Still reviewing, and looking into background. Don't have copious wikitime at the moment, but I am looking into your allegations. Regards, AGK [•] 23:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks.Owain the 1st (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry that you think that I am biased, but I have already refuted similar allegations, and would encourage you to read the discussion in my talk page archives. There is more than one perspective, and you should consider mine as well as those of this "board" you speak of. I do not see how you can think that alleging that I "did not bother to read" your statement is at all acceptable. In every comment to me here, you have made unsubstantiated generalisations about my motives or biases, and it is unprofessional. Lastly, as it clearly did not occur to you, I would point out that I did read your comments about Cptnono, but I am looking into them. It will take a while to consider your allegations, and it would be more helpful if you were patient with me, and not grossly unfriendly. YMMV. Regards, AGK [•] 20:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I see nothing wrong with the way I have addressed you at all. I see you never even commented on my links to cptnono hounding me. There seems to be a lot of talk on this board that you are biased in favour of the Israelis, seems to be everywhere and I have to say I agree with that opinion.Owain the 1st (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:NVA pose for picture in Presidential Palace at end of Vietnam war.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:NVA pose for picture in Presidential Palace at end of Vietnam war.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 22:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)