User talk:Overvecht3301
Links to draft articles
[edit]Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Mut Castle. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Khedivate of Egypt
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Khedivate of Egypt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know much about that kind of stuff. I just add a language with the source. Here is the link to the source:
- https://academic.oup.com/cairo-scholarship-online/book/20584/chapter/179841979
- If there is a problem, could you please fix it? But don't remove it. It is a fact that the Khedive of Egypt spoke Ottoman Turkish. Overvecht3301 (talk) 08:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Muhammad Ali Pasha, you may be blocked from editing. Fragrant Peony (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest you do your research. They migrated from Konya or even Erzincan. Overvecht3301 (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are still ignoring what I said and removing it in vain. The so-called neutral encyclopedia. You know, I stopped now. Keep telling people history the wrong way. You didn't even open and look at my sources. I didn't even remove the Albanian claim. Anyway. Overvecht3301 (talk) 10:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- i stopped already Overvecht3301 (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Mentioned at ANI regarding Ottoman battle articles
[edit]Hello Overvecht3301. Please see this link. You can respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have nothing with these guys. Overvecht3301 (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)