User talk:Overmanic

Proposed deletion of Rush for Win

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rush for Win, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RenegadeMonster (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Analogue and digital article

As you removed the hoax tag from Analogue and digital your input at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analogue and digital would be helpful. Wasted Oompa-Loompa (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Analogue and digital

A tag has been placed on Analogue and digital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. 66.57.0.15 (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Overmanic. unless you plan on improving the article to meet wikipedia standards, please don't recreate articles deleted via a WP:PROD. thanks. --Kaini (talk) 21:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]