User talk:OverThrone

Welcome!

Hello, OverThrone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like OverThrone, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OverThrone

The article OverThrone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of OverThrone

I have nominated OverThrone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OverThrone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of OverThrone

I have nominated OverThrone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OverThrone (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at OverThrone. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Monday, March 29

Re: Mamma Mia! (film)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mamma Mia! (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Saving Sara, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons why the article can't stay:

WP:Articles for deletion/OverThrone, the deletion of another related show.
Lack of verifiability: the one source included in the article did not mention the show at all.

If you can provide legitimate, independent reliable sources that verify the existence of the show—and by existence, I mean the show is in production, not just rumoured for later production—I'll restore it. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]