User talk:OutmianYakta

A page you started (Ray Siemens) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ray Siemens, OutmianYakta!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your contributions

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix Let's Talk 15:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Maguire (digital artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Maguire (digital artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Maguire (digital artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OutmianYakta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael J. Maguire (Irish digital artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael J. Maguire (Irish digital artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Maguire (Irish digital artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hug^syrup 14:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi. A couple of quick notes:

WP:COI. While it may not apply, if you have a connection with any of the subjects you have written about, you should take a look through the WP:COI guidelines.
MOS:PMC. I'm sure it was entirely unintentional, but in this edit you shortened a quote to the extent that it changed its meaning. At least to my reading. "The emergence of new voices owes much to small publishers like New Binary ~~and others~~". The removal of "and others", to my read, implied that Geden was assigning additional credit (for the "emergence of new voices") to the subject org. To my mind, the "and others" is relevant in that quote.
MOS:WTW. Please take a quick look at this guideline. Describing someone as "the late" or has having "passed away" falls under MOS:EUPHEMISM. Wikipedia's MOS favours precise terms. Also, describing a journal as "most prestigious" falls within the scope of MOS:PUFFERY. (Generally speaking editorial flourishes, especially those with promotional overtones, are best avoided. Like describing things as "major projects". When "projects" suffices. Or using terms like "considerable critical acclaim". Which also falls under MOS:PUFFERY and WP:PROMO. See also WP:NPOV and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV.)

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Re COI, these these subjects are not known to me. I was assigned one as a project many years ago and have continued to maintain the page and add related articles. OutmianYakta (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Fair enough RE COI. In honesty I wouldn't have mentioned it at all, except the ('own work') images you uploaded to Commons for several semi-related articles, have an "official photography" type vibe. Guliolopez (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for adding the well-crafted article on Lisa Harding! Klbrain (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]