User talk:OttomanJackson/Archive1

Welcome and introduction

Hi, OttomanJackson. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  01:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

ようこそ You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people. Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes. Play in your user area. For example, create User:OttomanJackson/test. Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009. When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references. Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! --  Chzz  ►  01:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Stop

Stop recreating these song articles, as they are not notable and fail WP:NMUSIC. Pyrrhus16 23:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

• Yes, just to back up the above editor. The relevant policy is WP:MUSIC - it says "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. (However) a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 01:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Notabilty

Notability is based on coverage in many, many reliable sources. Not on a handful and not on your original research or opinion. The images you added to the article were taken by Discogs off of google images and they have not credited the photographer, as it is clearly a photograph of the product and not just an album cover on its own. The images fail WP:FAIRUSE and are a copyright violation. Pyrrhus16 10:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Stop edit warring by restoring the images to the "Speechless" article, when several editors are opposed to them. Use the article talk page, where these issues can be discussed. Continue along this route and you may be blocked from editing for edit-warring. Pyrrhus16 21:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Conquests (Civilization III Scenarios)

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Conquests (Civilization III Scenarios), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pyrrhus16 22:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Your articles are redirect and nominated for deletion because they are not independently notable, meaning that they are not written about in many, many reliable, third party sources. I think you would benefit from using the this to create any future articles. Pyrrhus16 22:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Theodosia Throckmorton

I have nominated Theodosia Throckmorton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodosia Throckmorton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pyrrhus16 22:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:MJ Speechless Disc.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:MJ Speechless Disc.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of OttomanJackson

A tag has been placed on OttomanJackson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pyrrhus16 22:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MJ Speechless Cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJ Speechless Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Rheims Faculty of Law

As there's no rush to accept submissions, you should always cleanup the article first. Right now there are several broken references, entire sections which must be removed, and poor sourcing.  fetchcomms☛ 23:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

In addition, a comment was left unaddressed, that it needed (and still needs) a copyedit. If you could assist in that, please do.  fetchcomms☛ 23:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Do not lie in edit summaries, as you did here. That edit does not constitute vandalism at all. Furthermore, use the article talk page to discuss issues and cease edit warring. Pyrrhus16 23:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rosemary Anne.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rosemary Anne.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  fetchcomms☛ 23:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MJ Speechless Back.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJ Speechless Back.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  fetchcomms☛ 23:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

User:IBen/TB mono 01:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Speechless (Michael Jackson song) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. mono 01:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OttomanJackson. You have new messages at Fetchcomms's talk page
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template.
(This notice was added 20:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC) by Fetchcomms)

Recreating Greg Heffley

Please do not re-create articles where there is consensus to redirect per an AfD discussion. This page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Heffley established consensus against his notability, and your one opinion does not override consensus. Thank you and かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 06:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Don't Walk Away (Michael Jackson song), you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. I'm sorry to have to use such a warning; I appreciate your efforts, however - considering all the other messages above, I really think that you need to read WP:FIRST, Wikipedia:Image use policy#Requirements and Help:Edit summary. To create an article that is not ready to go live, use WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. I will add some help about referencing, below. Please ask if you need help.  Chzz  ►  07:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

How references work

Simple references These require two parts; a) Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref> b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}"; == References == {{reflist}} (an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections) To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:OttomanJackson/reftest and try it out. Named references Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook"> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/> Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. Citation templates You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look; Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} </ref> Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result. For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Proposed deletion of Theodosia Throckmorton

The article Theodosia Throckmorton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~BLM (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Theodosia Throckmorton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do NOT recreate pages that you or others have created that have been recently deleted per consensus. I suggest you take the time to read some of the helpful links supplied above. Pyrrhus16 16:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

References

In this edit you forget something (marked on bold text): ">{{cite web|url=http://www.discogs.com/Michael-Jackson-Speechless/release/1425530. |title=Speechless by Michael Jackson'|accessdate=April 24, 2010}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.discogs.com/Michael-Jackson-Speechless/release/1425530. |title=Speechless by Michael Jackson'|accessdate=April 24, 2010}}</ref> . Be careful Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 01:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please stop making disruptive edits by re-creating article's for un-notable Michael Jackson songs. If you continue to create article's for un-notable things, as well as undoing other editors edits that redirect the pages, then you will be blocked from editing. Crystal Clear x3 07:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rosemary Anne.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rosemary Anne.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. • ɔ ʃ → 23:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Somebody Else found it. Check the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OttomanJackson (talk • contribs)

Somebody else found what? Pyrrhus16 21:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

So is 24.15.54.202 (talk · contribs) the same person as you? Pyrrhus16 21:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Do not alter my comments as you did here. Is this editor you or not? Pyrrhus16 21:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Can you please answer the question for clarity? Pyrrhus16 21:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

One of wikipedia's rules says don't ask for personal information. Please cease your disturbance, as I will not say whether or not 24.15.54.202 is me and you are annoying me with your constant pestering for this info OttomanJackson (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

It would be so much easier for everybody if you were as pernickety about Wikpedia's other rules and guidelines, particularly those regarding notability and image copyright. In my opinion and from my observations, 24.15.54.202 clearly is you. I suggest you stop using it as a sockpuppet in disagreements, as you may be blocked for sockpuppeteering. Pyrrhus16 10:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

What is your so-called "proof" OttomanJackson (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

The duck test suggests that you are the same person, as you have a very similar pattern of edits. This edit backs up the suspicion, as well as this one to the image that is up for deletion that you created. Funny how an IP with a similar pattern of edits as you was able to stumble upon the image on Wikipedia and find the source of the photograph as well. If you are going to use your IP, I suggest that you not use it abusively as a means of escalating edit wars amongst other contributors opposed to your actions, as these type of people always get found out. Pyrrhus16 22:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: ???

No, you cannot recreate the deleted page because other editors discussed the matter and stated that it should be deleted outright, with no redirect. The song articles that you create fail WP:NSONGS, so I suggest you stop and instead work on the thousands of song articles that already exist and that need improvement. Pyrrhus16 21:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pyrrhus16 10:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Last warning

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Heaven Can Wait (Michael Jackson song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pyrrhus16 01:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

We've had enough

(Track 13, disc 4, The Ultimate Collection)

Michael Jackson fans buy this song on iTunes [THIS SONG ONLY NOT THE FULL ALBUM] on June 25 ,2010 so it gets to #1 on the billboards. It is one of his most powerful songs and easily deserves the moment. OttomanJackson (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tarc (talk) 02:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Pointy behavior

Regarding your nominations of Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds and Revolution 9 for deletion, please take a look at WP:POINT. Doing something disruptive to make a point is highly discouraged on Wikipedia -- please don't do it again, you're likely to be blocked. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Notable and non-notable songs

Please read WP:MUSIC - it is quite clear. "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song ... a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." This is why there is an article for Revolution 9 - look at the detail there - and why there isn't for every single Michael Jackson song ever (or even every Beatles song ever!) - there simply aren't the reliable in-depth sources out there to create enough for a separate article for each one. All notable Michael Jackson songs have an article already. As the user above said, please don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point again - you will almost certainly be blocked. Black Kite (t) (c) 06:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pyrrhus16 19:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Any further disruptive or pointy editing will earn you a block. You have been pointed to the relevant policies regarding which songs merit their own articles and which ones do not. Please review these policies closely. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 19:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

I deleted Michael Jackson is awesome! as redirects have to be plausible search terms. No one will type that looking for the page on Jackson. More to the point, you are still failing to tone down your editing as you have been asked to countless times now. Stop, or get blocked. SGGH ^ping! 21:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 22:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OttomanJackson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

IP address is shared by multiple people, I did not sockpuppet

Decline reason:

You're not blocked for socking, but since you mentioned it -- you're the only one to have used that IP in many months, and you used it to stack votes in an AFD, so you may consider this your only warning; do that again and the next block will be permanent. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OttomanJackson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry, I did not understand what was meant by disruptive. Now I do, and will stop it.

Decline reason:

The admission of sockpuppetry by itself merits a decline. However, I find it incredible that you didn't know what is disruptive, given the numerous warnings on your talk page. I suggest you sit this block out and use this time to rethink your behavior here. Blueboy96 23:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OttomanJackson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What do you mean, "admission of sockpuppetry. If you won't get rid of it, at least shorten it.

Decline reason:

I'm declining this request, first of all, because it is very unclear (shorten what?) and secondly, it does nothing to address your behavior and how you will change to avoid future disruption. TNXMan 01:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OttomanJackson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My block has been long enough. I will no longer make POINTy AfD Nominations. I am sorry if it was disruptive and will discontinue this behavior. Please unblock me. :) Please?

Decline reason:

Looking at the contributions, and the history of this talkpage, I am surprised this is only a week. Major disruption that took an ANI entry to invoke a mere week-long block. Tit-for-tat Pointy AFD's don't belong. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User talk:166.137.140.101

I suspect to be you, I have extended your block. SGGH ^ping! 21:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

• I suspect that the two Illinois-based IPs on the AfD are related, too. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I have nothing to do with them. Please reconsider the Money (Michael Jackson song) AfD with this knowledge. Thanks OttomanJackson 23:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Series1996$100usnote.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Series1996$100usnote.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Talk:2010 Stanley Cup Finals

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:2010 Stanley Cup Finals for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Threads such as "I want my [favorite sports team] to win" or "GO [my favorite team]!" are inappropriate discussions and will be removed. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Speechless

Speechless was made a featured article on May 22, after discussions with many experienced reviewers on how exactly to word the article. Therefore, it is not helpful or acceptable to revert to a past version. Pyrrhus16 21:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

It was promoted to FA class on May 22. It is unlikely that it will be on the main page in the near future. Some information was removed or reworded in the article because reviewers for FA felt that it was needed for a good quality article. Pyrrhus16 22:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

There was too much information in the critical reception section of Speechless. Articles should be written in a summary style, meaning that not every fact has to be in an article. It is unlikely that Speechless will be on the main page soon because we have already had a few Michael Jackson-related articles appear on the main page in the past few months. Money was deleted by AFD discussion, so cannot be recreated. Pyrrhus16 22:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Warning

Regarding this; I'd be very careful if I were you. And it is "pointlessly", not "pointlessley". I suggest that you just watch yourself and, perhaps for once, think before you type and press the save button. Pyrrhus16 00:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)