User talk:Otto ter Haar/2018

Archive 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018

Bad experience with me?

Hello Otto ter Haar, in this recent edit you wrote about me: "I have bad experiences with [The Banner] and user Robotje. They both are edit warriors who abuse Wikipedia as a "battleground"." I don't recall any conflict with you on en-wiki. My reply in the dispute discussion you initiated should preferably be limited to 2000 bytes ("'... less than 2000 characters if possible, ...") so I hope you can help me out on this page so I can use those 2000 bytes more effectively. I am also surprised you characterise me as an abuser of Wikipedia and edit warrior. Can you give me several examples of the last 24 months of my edits on en-wiki on which you can explain/'prove' that I am abusing en-wiki and act as a edit warrior on en-wiki? - Robotje (talk) 22:39, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I admit that regarding too you my wording was too strong. It was a reaction on the wording of The Banner who started the discussion about "loosing the battle". I will correct this. Otto (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for consensus?

Hello Otto ter Haar, a change you did was reverted because it was unsourced and the information could not be found on the website of that organization. You undid that revert with this edit and mentioned in the edit summary "... this is edit-warring instead of looking for consensus". You did not give a source and you admitted you were edit-warring. Instead of looking for consensus it should be more about providing a source. Since you might have a COI issue here you should be extra careful about changing that article instead of engage in edit-warring. Just give the public source you used for changing this info in that article. - Robotje (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have just added a source. About your allegation of edit warring I explain my view on the talk page of The Greens. --Otto (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of near misses of attacks with gunfire or missiles on civil aviation, from its old location at User:Otto ter Haar/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of near misses of attacks with gunfire or missiles on civil aviation (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dodger67 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is an arbitrary collection of unrelated incidents, not a coherent encyclopedic topic. There are no sources that discuss the phenomenon of "near misses of attacks with gunfire or missiles on civil aviation" as a topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of near misses of attacks with gunfire or missiles on civil aviation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of near misses of attacks with gunfire or missiles on civil aviation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Otto ter Haar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of attempted shootdowns of civil aviation (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

Appears to fail WP:LISTN.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of attempted shootdowns of civil aviation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of attempted shootdowns of civil aviation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 23:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Otto ter Haar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]