User talk:Otterswimshome

Feel free to leave a scribble.

And while I'm writing on my own bathroom wall, here, has anybody considered some sort of Wiki tag that would let one mouseover a link and produce a short definition? So if I'm writing a six page entry on The Wakefield Master, maybe I could write and tag a short definition that might crop up on a mouseover so somebody who encounters the link doesn't have to open the whole article but gets a pop-up short definition... Just dreaming. Might be too cumbersome. Otterswimshome (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Short Definitions and the Future Of Wiki Reference Searching

So I've got this idea that would be really easy to implement, I should think.

You're researching on Wikipedia, and you come across a reference to (for example) The Wakefield Master. You sort of need to know who that is to get the gist of the article you're reading, but you really don't need the full six page article right now.

How would it be if you mouse over the link to The Wakefield Master and it pulls up just a short definition? A little box pops up that says, "The name given to an anonymous English playwright of the fifteenth century supposed to have contributed to the English Wakefield Cycle." Ah, now I can get on with reading the article I'm reading on stanzaic forms of the fifteenth century without opening a new window. I didn't need to know more than that.

It's just an idea: it would mean that when we're writing articles, we'd just need to compose and tag something that would exist as a "short definition." Otterswimshome (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Southern limit of the distribution of the green anaconda

Good evening:

Please allow me to share an article with you. Maybe you will find it interesting:

http://www.naturapop.com/home/southern-limit-of-the-distribution-of-the-green-anaconda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.2.207.74 (talk) 00:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Henry C. Castellanos has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henry C. Castellanos. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 07:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry C. Castellanos has been accepted

Henry C. Castellanos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]