User talk:OttRider

Stay for Awhile

I moved the article back to "Stay for Awhile" because that is the name of the song. "Awhile" is the correct term. http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-while-vs-awhile/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Apologies, you are correct. I found what I thought was a definitive reference for the other (correct) spelling, but turns out that was a different version, not the referenced song. OttRider (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awhile vs A While

Having received a few comments about this edit:

"Awhile" is an adverb. It is used with a verb, without a preposition such as "for". So you can write "I will stay awhile".
"A while" is a noun phrase, taking a preposition. So you can write "I will stay for a while".

Writing "I will stay for awhile" is incorrect. Since "awhile" has the meaning "for a while", that would be equivalent to writing "I will stay for for a while".

See here for a more fulsome discussion. OttRider (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You keep making changes and in several cases did it against correct usage. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Sorry, sir. With respect, you are incorrect. In one of your reverts you give as a reason "awhile is an English word". This is true - "awhile" is an English word. But it is the wrong word following the word "for".

Awhile can be used alone, as in "I will wait awhile".
"A while" may be used with the preposition "for", as in "I will wait for a while".
Awhile, used with "for", as in "I will wait for awhile", is always incorrect.

References:

OttRider (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, OttRider! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! MrBill3 (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Andrew A. Skolnick may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[:Category:Writers from Chicago, Illinois]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Adam Rutherford at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leila Schneps

I created a Wikidata entry for Leila Schneps - you can find a link to it under the "tools" menu on her Wikipedia article. You might like to take a look and see whether anything needs to be added. It's always a good idea to make a matching Wikidata entry, when you make a new article here. Good work on that article, BTW! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the several constructive edits and for the advice. First new page, much to learn.

DYK for Adam Rutherford

On 10 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adam Rutherford, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adam Rutherford. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leila Schneps

On 13 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leila Schneps, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Leila Schneps (pictured), mathematician, researcher, and author of Math on Trial also writes mathematically-themed murder mysteries under the pen-name Catherine Shaw? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leila Schneps. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice article. perhaps should have moved your sand box User:OttRider/sandbox-cc, rather than cut paste; hope you continue, with more Women scientists, many red links [User:Keilana/Female scientist list]][. Duckduckstop (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Faye Flam

Hello! Your submission of Faye Flam at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WebCite archive

Hi,

I just wanted to pay your attention to WebCite archive which allows you to archive current version of web pages. It might be useful when you cite some web page which is subject of frequent changes. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Faye Flam

On 6 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Faye Flam, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that author and science journalist Faye Flam (pictured) has also published in Parade under the name Higgs the Science Cat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Faye Flam. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 03:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Faye Flam

Hello, OttRider,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Faye Flam should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faye Flam .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Fiachra10003 (talk) 02:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, OttRider. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, OttRider. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Rice Award

		Congratulations!
		The Anne Rice Award honors editors who have improved Wikipedia's coverage of women writers by creating a biography of a woman writer who, like Anne Rice, used a pen name, nom de plume, literary initials, or pseudonym on the title page or by-line of her works in place of her real name. On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the biography on Leila Schneps, who wrote as Catherine Shaw. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]