Jump to content

User talk:OtherAccount

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi, I have no intention of continuing an Edit war with you. So, I will just discuss about the recent edits which you have made one by one and also, why i must revert them.

  • Firstly, on Marina Nemat. I have added text that were backed up with reliable sources, which you have unnecessarily removed. The source clearly states that she was forced to convert from Christianity to Islam in order to save her life. It also states that after her release, she had a Christian wedding with her husband in a Church. Unlike Muslim marriages where a Muslim man can have a Christian or a Jewish wife, A Christian marriage cannot take place unless both the husband and the bride is Christian. It is impossible for a Muslim

woman to have a Christian marriage unless she converts to Christianity beforehand. If Marina Nemat had not reverted to Christianity, she would have had a Court marriage. As a Christian myself, I can vouch for it.

  • Secondly, on Nazli Sabri. You obviously havent read the reference properly, since the source does provide the following details of her conversion to Roman Catholicism:

H.M. Queen Nazli (b. at Alexandria 25th June 1894; d. at Los Angeles, California, USA, 29th May 1978, bur. there at the Garden of the Holy Cross Cemetery, Culver City), educ. Pensionnat de la Mère de Dieu, Garden City, Cairo, and Notre-Dame de Sion, Bacos Ramleh Alexandria, rcvd: the Decoration of al-Kemal in brilliants (1917), who took the names Mary Elizabeth on her baptism into the Roman Catholic Church and was consequently deprived of her rank, privileges and property by her son 1st August 1950, daughter of H.E. (Sahib al-Maali) 'Abdu'r-Rahim Pasha Sabri, sometime Minister of Agriculture and Governor of Cairo ....

  • Thirdly, I am removing the tags that you have placed for the Gulshan Esther, Ibrahim Abdullah, and Daniel Ali articles. If you can prove to me that these articles contain original research or unverified claims, weasel words and peacock terms by showing me sentences which posess these charcteristics from each of these respective articles, then please feel free to put it back in.

Please dont add tags stating that "the neutrality and factual accuracy of this article are disputed", when there is no dispute or discussion in the talk page. Again, prove that these articles may be inaccurate or unbalanced in favor of certain viewpoints, if you wish to add these tags. Joyson Noel (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]