User talk:Otapka

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Otapka! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek.69 ^talk 01:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Ľubomír Šatka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:29, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Hi. :-) WP:FOOTY doesn't consider Transfermarkt a reliable source. I removed content you backed up with Transfermarkt references at László Bénes. Also, I'm curios why you removed this line "Eligible for both Hungarian and Slovak national football teams," (diff). It seems relevant to Bénes' career. Regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your detailed response. That sorts it for me. Appreciated! Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Lukáš Haraslín

Hey Otapka,

I've just noticed that you did a lot of work on the Lukáš Haraslín page. As someone who is a huge fan of Haraslín and Lechia Gdańsk I'd just not got round to editing his profile on wikipedia yet, so thank you, and keep doing what you're doing. :)

All the best,

OLLSZCZ (talk) 00:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ľubomír Šatka were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Martin Trnovský concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Martin Trnovský, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

FK Pohronie players

Hi, it will be better continue discussion about FK Pohronie players here. FK Kosice is another case. They doesn´t declare history of MKF/VSS because of they debt. Example with FK Dukla Banská Bystrica is correct. FK Dukla Banská Bystrica dissolved in 2017, then owner of SK Kremnicka renamed his team to MFK Dukla Banská Bystrica (with simillar name, and logo). And the same happened in Ziar, FK dissolved in 2012, and owner of D.Zdana renamed his team to Pohronie. (OK another name and logo, but same story, same place, stadium etc...). (Svk fan) 21:10, 3 February 2020 (CET)

Keď tu, tak asi môžem aj slovensky. If you don't speak Slovak, let me know. S Pohroním to vôbec nie je také same story - veď predsa 5 rokov hrávali v Dolnej Ždani a presun do ZH sa stal aktuálny len preto, že sa tam urobil štadión. O čom je identita klubu, ak nie o mene a logu? Jasné klub si môže zmeniť logo aj sa premenovať, ale predsa je jasné, že toto je iný prípad. Vzniklo nové logo, nového klubu. Klub, ktorý nie je ani žiarsky, ani ždaňsky, ale regionálny. Tak to aj bolo v 2012 deklarované.

Navyše Pohronie predsa nevzniklo premenovaním Dolnej Ždane ale vznikom nového klubu, do ktorého sa zlúčili existujúce šturktúry a hráčske základne ZH a DŽ, a ktorý získal vtedajšiu treťoligovú licenciu D.Ž. Nešlo o premenovanie (ak by aj išlo tak tým pádom dnešné Pohronie je dedičom tradície D.Ž. nie FK ZH). Keďže ide o spojenie ide o koniec klubu A a klubu B a vznik klubu C, za tým účelom, aby mohol nový klub hrať druhú ligu, keďže tam bola (je) podmienka mládežníckych družstiev, ktorú DŽ nespĺňala. Na základe toho, že išlo o fúziu je to podobné ako spojenie Senca a DS, pričom nikoho by hádam nenapadlo dávať reprezentantov čo hrali za Senec na stránku DAC.

Kremnička absorbovala hráčov z už neexistujúcej FK Dukly, to je pravda, ale došlo ku jednostrannému premenovaniu, ktoré priamo nadväzuje na tradíciu starej Dukly. Preto nemusíme rozlišovať medzi starou a novou Duklou. Všetkých notable players môžeme písať na jednu stránku Dukly. FC Košice, áno dlhy jasné. Ale FC sa k tej VSS tradícií hlásia napríklad mottom Všetci Spolu Silnejší - narozdiel od Pohronia a NAPRIEK tomu tam nedávame všetkých notable players starého 1.FC/MFK/VSS. Plus tá situácia je veľmi podobná Pohroniu. Veď predsa z Vyšného Opátskeho urobili FK Košice a pred touto sezónou sa spojili s Barcou (mládež), aby vzniklo FC Košice (na Wiki, žiaľ ako FK). Je to taká istá paralela ako DŽ a ZH. Veď FK Košice (Opátske) predsa Barcu nepotrebovalo len tak, ale potrebovali mládež a preto padlo FK Košice (Opátske), padla Barca a vzniklo FC Košice. Rovnako Ždaňa by inak nepotrebovala Žiar - ale mládež. Padol klub A, padol klub B a spojili sa do nového klubu C. Budeme teda aj na stránku FC Košíc dávať hráčov, ktorý sa dostali do repre cez Opátske a Barcu? To hádam nie.

Druhá vec: Ja, ako Žiarčan a fanda Pohronia, by som prvý rád videl čím viac známych mien, ktoré hrali za Pohronie. Ale faktom je, že ani Škriniar ani Adam Nemec za Žiar seniorsky futbal nehrali! Teraz keby sme na každú Wikistránku dávali reprezentantov, ktorý v klube pôsobili ako mládežníci ale posunuli sa inde, tak tie kategórie Notable players sú nekonečné.

Preto si myslím, že je dobré ku Pohroniu dávať len tých notable players, ktorý hrali v klube FK Pohronie za seniorský tím, ktorý existuje od leta 2012. Tí, čo hrali za ZH a DŽ nech sú na stránkach ZH a ĎZ. Plus nech je v texte na stránke Pohronia spomenuté, to čo som tam minule dal, že notable players, ktorí pôsobili v ZH a DŽ sú na stránkach ZH a DŽ. Tak je v tom poriadok a je jasné, že koho spomíname. (Otapka) 23:37, 3 February 2020 (CET)

• tiez som zo ZH, aka nahoda :)

No prave preto ze sa zlucili (ZH a DŽ) a nasledne povodne kluby zanikli, by to tam malo byt, kedze Pohronie sa hlasi k tradicii Ziarskeho futbalu (keby ten dosiahol nejake uspechy Pohronie by si ich urcite prisvojilo :D ). Dam dalsi priklad TTS Trencin (zanikol 1992) a uplne novy AS Trencin ktory vznikol 1992 a hlasi sa k tradicii TTS takisto pise notable players na svojej stranke.

Vsak prave o to ide, napisat do notable players vsetkych hracov, aj hracov ktori su odchovanci a hrali "len" za mladez, ked bude zoznam dlhy to nieje problem (O tom je wikipedia zhromazdit vsetky relevantne informacie). Pozri napr. V.Weiss ml, alebo R.Mak, tiez hrali za Inter/Slovan len za mladez a v notable players su a takch prikladov najdes X...

Z mojej strany nema zmysel to tam stale doplnat, ale myslim si ze by nicomu nevadilo keby to tam bolo. (Svk fan) 12:50, 4 February 2020 (CET)

• ...

Práve to, že zanikli (a majú svoju vlastnú Wiki stránku), tak nevidím dôvod ich písať na Pohroní. "By si ich prisvojilo", to zrejme áno :D ale neprisvojilo si. Nehlásia sa. TTS a AS sa javí tiež ako Dukla. Nakoľko preberajú identitu, tak to nemôžeme celkom porovnávať s Pohroním.

Ako beriem, ak píšeme aj mládež, tak fajn. Priznám sa, ja som doteraz pridával len tých, čo hrali za seniorov. Budem do budúcna aj juniorov.

Ako fakt si myslím, že máme teraz nový klub s novými hráčmi - FK je žiaľ dead. Ako chápem, že Pohroniu by to akurát dobré meno urobilo, ale Wiki stránky kde pridávam sa snažím robiť objektívne tak preto mi to tam nesedí. Vravím, napísať, že tých čo hrali za FK a DŽ nájdete na stránkach FK a DŽ.

Hmm.. len napríklad rozmýšľam. Maingeho na jeseň povolali do repre, ale nenašiel som, že by hral. Na lavičke bol ale do zápasu zrejme nenastúpil. V takom prípade asi nemá čo robiť v notable players, podľa kritérií, že hral repre zápas, či? Ak jeho áno, tak potom môžeme dať aj Domina Holeca. Čo myslíš? (Otapka) 12:07, 5 February 2020 (CET)

• Neprisvojilo lebo nemalo co, ziadne uspechy tam neboli... :) aj ked si myslim ze casom sa k hracom ako Nemec, Skriniar atd prihlasia a pridaju na svoj web nieco o nich, ako to maju ine kluby o svojich odchovancoch. Ano Maigne zatial nehral (aspon podla soccerway), takze by tam nemal byt.

(Svk fan) 9:40, 7 February 2020 (CET)

Categories

Please, when you create new categories, it's really important that you add categories to them. If they're not placed in the category hierarchy then they might as well not exist, as neither humans nor maintenance bots will be able to find them. As it happens, for categories such as Category:U.S. Folgore Caratese A.S.D. players I've just created a new template that will do that automatically (and eg check to see that the club category name matches the corresponding article name), in this case you would add {{Clubplayerscat|Italy}}. Le Deluge (talk) 10:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Miladin Vujošević for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miladin Vujošević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miladin Vujošević until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Piping at Jan Kliment

Hi. :-) I reverted your piping of VfB Stuttgart at Jan Kliment. WP:KARLSRUHER states:

"In German football, it is not common practice to list clubs by just the town/city names, in the way that in England we refer to Liverpool or Blackpool. The club is always listed with a club name, e.g. Borussia Dortmund or Kickers Offenbach. If the team does not have an elaborate name like this, then the SC, FC, VfB (etc.) should be left in, i.e. VfB Stuttgart. This applies in all lists, infoboxes, league tables, statistics tables, fixtures, match details, and in a player's lead."

Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Sorry for the trouble. I'll bear that in mind :) (Otapka) 23:37, 3 February 2020 (CET)

No problem. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Eneji Moses

I have reverted your move as undiscussed and controversial. Please use WP:RM. I have also removed your inappropriate match commentary. Please do not forget that this is an encyclopaedia. GiantSnowman 14:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, which bit of the match description would you consider inappropriate? I felt it was a rather factual description of his start in Senica - debut, first starting-XI appearance and subsequent injury. From my experience with Wikipedia it is not uncommon to highlight such milestone matches (debut, first goal etc). I understand why you may have reverted the move, although it was done in good faith, considering repetitive refernce to the player as Peter Eneji in media etc. User talk:Otapka 15:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. An edit that you recently made to Eneji Moses seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GiantSnowman 11:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Ole Käuper

Hi there. Thanks for adding piping at Ole Käuper, I'm not very familiar with Slovak clubs. As for the league category, we cannot add it until the players has made an appearance in the league so I removed it for now. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Ladji Mallé moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ladji Mallé, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Eneji Moses article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 17:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I have been familiar with information concerning his POB from one source and his transfer was already listed in the Football Association's registration system. You are right I forgot to add these citations, but I believe they are sufficient. Please let me know if something doesn't add up. Otapka 17:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I have again reverted your bizarre formatting of the infobox. Please leave the infobox as it is. GiantSnowman 21:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure. Personally, I wouldn't call it bizarre considering that it is a go-to formatting in the Slovak league and dozens of other cases but that's fine. Otapka 9:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

References

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pavel Čmovš, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 18:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MFK Tatran Liptovský Mikuláš, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Nagy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

"Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1989)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1989) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 26#Marek Ujlaky (footballer, born 1989) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ahmed Fofana

Hello, Otapka,

Thank you for creating Ahmed Fofana.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article does not meet notability for sports. The existing references are considered database entries, and no longer satisfy NSPORT. New references needed, or the article may be removed. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve OFK Trebatice

Hello, Otapka,

Thank you for creating OFK Trebatice.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article - about a non-professional association football team - needs to meet general notability. What is needed are references significant coverage SIGCOV about this team, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide.
Statistics, team rosters, soccerway, Instagram, Facebook are not reliable sources. You need at least three reliable sources.
You should also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dávid Petrík

Hello, Otapka,

Thank you for creating Dávid Petrík.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Courtesy notification

Hi there - courtesy notification that I reverted your (presumably unintentional) blanking at Marek Rodák‎, whilst retaining the update to international caps you made. Note that I also reverted your update to the number of Fulham appearances, as playoff matches are not counted as part of the league total - you will see in the career stats section that they are included in the "other" column. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 07:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Otapka

Thank you for creating Patrick Karhan.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

all time records IIHF

Are you using the National teams of ice hockey page for these? I don't particularly care but you are likely going to get some who say that the website is not reliable and will want to remove the content. It does not appear to be something that the IIHF or the different federations keep track of, but finding an alternate source may be helpful.18abruce (talk) 12:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

I second that, this website is not reliable and don't rely too much on it, they have some missing older games, mistakes in all-time calculations, wrong all-time scorers, assists, total player points etc., I even found wrong match results from top tier matches like World Championship Division I. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited FC Slovan Galanta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jakub Sedláček.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

FK Tatran Turzovka moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to FK Tatran Turzovka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:FK Tatran Turzovka

Hello, Otapka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "FK Tatran Turzovka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Dávid Petrík for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dávid Petrík is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dávid Petrík until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)