User talk:Ostrichfern

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Society for the Preservation of Wild Culture, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Society for the Preservation of Wild Culture was changed by Ostrichfern (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965343 on 2011-05-30T16:12:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ostrichfern was creating a new page for a large project from the article page, which is an entity of interest in itself, The Journal of Wild Culture, which is why I was deleting the information of JWC from the SPWC page and putting it into the JWC page.

I would still like to delete the text on the SPWC page. How do I do this? Ostrichfern.

Proposed deletion of The Journal of Wild Culture

The article The Journal of Wild Culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about two incarnations of a cultural magazine. The first incarnation was published between 1986 and 1991 and published 7 issues. There are some sources given for this incarnation, but as far as I can see, these sources cover some related events rather than the magazine itself. There are quite a number of Google hits, but most are WP mirrors and none seem to be independent in-depth covering of the magazine. The second incarnation does not even exist yet and the only sources that I can find are its homepage and a job ad for a managing editor. No evidence that either of the incarnations (alone or together) meets WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]