User talk:Osrius

Yo Bbb23 you blocked my account indefinitely, it is not fair to get harassed and be forced to create a new user only to be blocked for sock puppetry when it's not the case.

I have created some very popular evergreen pages on Wikipedia and people changed mine and I never reacted the others did on here by blocking the page from being edited or blocking a user as that only provokes the person blocked to retaliate by vandalizing pages they created, which makes the community a negative place where admin do not want to engage in edits because of the harassment they get, and this is a reason Universities like mine cannot use Wikipedia as a reference.

The "sidebar" on the Gen-X,Z and Millennials pages is incorrect and/or outdated.

I suggested to create a newly designed "infobox" that includes the Xennials generation, which is getting many headlines in recent news as there own smaller generation after Gen-X and before Millennials and was trying to include the page in the "sidebar" for the "infobox" to be made.

Then I was harassed and having every edit changed, and told I will be blocked for doing what I am supposed to do on here.

Additionally the account youreditsarewrong was created by me to avoid harassment by others on those pages who sent me messages on my talk page making a negative stigma around my users reputation which will not be tolerated and is in violation of the community term for users.

I even continued to create multiple "good" edits on pages using that account and so there is no sock puppetry or or anything fishy going on, other than me trying to correct a page and having to go through a lot of hops to do so. Osirus 19:40, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Since you have just very clearly admitted that you created youreditsarewrong to avoid association with your edits using this account (which is a violation of the community's policy regarding sockpuppetry), I think you can stop whining now. In any case, leaving a message on your Talk page for Bbb23 is not going to be an effective method of appealing your block. Since you removed the notice that explained the correct way to appeal a block from this page, you'll need to retrieve it from your page history to see it. If you don't have time to do that, or if your appeal doesn't reflect an understanding of why you were blocked, your account will remain blocked indefinitely (which may be as it should be). General Ization ^Talk 20:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osrius (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey Bbb23 I warned your DA that you accomplished nothing other than I have new accounts and new IP, DMF Osirus 20:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.