User talk:Osmostrix

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmostrix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. I have accounts across the internet unrelated to the user Jyotinaik and was attempting to restore the article to its previous form because I wanted it to be available to anyone who wanted to learn more about this person.

Decline reason:

This doesn't explain how you were editing from the same computer and same IP address as that user. Yamla (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmostrix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The other user and myself use the same Internet router. See this link: https://www.howtogeek.com/247452/is-it-possible-for-different-people-to-have-the-same-public-ip-address/

Decline reason:

Yes, we understand how routers and NAT work. Only one unblock request is needed at a time, so see below. —DoRD (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given the overlap in editing, that makes this a violation of WP:MEAT. Note that the IP address wasn't the only technical evidence here, mind you. --Yamla (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Osmostrix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20583 was submitted on Feb 10, 2018 00:27:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmostrix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You claim that because I am willing to support another user's cause in maintaining the information on this site that this makes me unfit to contribute here, but how is your consistent censorship of me any different than what I've done? I haven't even been registered as a user for more than a day and already I've had my contributions rolled back, been accused of puppetry, and had my appeals blocked at least three different times. I don't know why it appears that we have the same IP address, but I can confirm that I am using a private machine and am the only person who is permitted access to it. The other user who attempted to contribute to this article has a completely separate device and has never once used this machine to edit a Wikipedia article. Moreover, it is only natural that if any one person attempts to censor documentation of a real person's life and their influence on history that more than one person would be affected by this and attempt to fix it. Wikipedia itself claims that blocks should not have a punitive effect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Blocks_should_not_be_punitive), but everything that has happened, including your consistent refusal to unblock me makes it clear that this has been a blatant attempt to censor this information. That is the truth.

Decline reason:

I don't know why it appears that we have the same IP address... Well, clearly you do know why (see previous unblock request). The accounts are either operated by the same person, or by multiple people working in concert, and both are violations of policy, so you'll need to address this rather than going on about censorship and punitive blocks. —DoRD (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop emailing me. I have no interest in reading the thoughts of duplicitous people. For what it is worth, it took me less than five minutes of Googling to connect you to the other account - Sitush (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Sitush, if that is your real name, I'm done playing games. I don't know what you hope to gain from censoring this article, but I'm not going to let you or anyone else keep this information down on the basis of your own lack of resources. You think I'm fake? You think I'm only in this because someone else told me to be? Make no mistake.

I am the One and Only, Osmostrix. I'll show all of you just how real I am.