User talk:Osmancan

Welcome!

Hello, Osmancan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Michaelas10 (T|C) 14:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Kurdistan, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SparrowsWing _(talk) 21:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Kurdistan. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kesac 21:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmancan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have learnt my lesson

Decline reason:

It's easy to just say that, but demonstrating it is another matter since your word is almost worthless now. If you want to be unblocked, you need to make a significant improvement to a pre-existing article by copy and pasting your proposed edits here. At which point you can then re-request unblocking. Only when another admin is satisfied you fully comprehend Wikipedia's policies and guidelines will you then be unblocked. -- Netsnipe ► 06:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You sure: [1]? Part Deux 20:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am absolutely sure. During the time that I was blocked from editing the wikipedia I understood the I took my privilege (which can be taken easily by the admisitrators) for granted. I request unbloking of my account so that I would be able to contrubute to the wikipedia in a more appropiate way. During this period I understood that vandalizing a charity is extremely ashaming. I promise that i will work for the wikipedia and against vandalism --Osmancan 21:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well you were warned twice before being blocked and possibly more if such templates were deleted. Why will you change your ways know?--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 04:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I am absoultely sure that I am sorry I hereby declare that I will not make and improvisation on th article called "Kurdistan" since I personally think that the "Kurdistan" may be copyrighted and it would be unfair to it's author yet I may improve other pages such as KKTC or tennis. YOU the administrators of the wikipedia are not entitled to claim that a part of Turkey does not belong to it. YOU are dividing a country without citing a source wich does not exist. Thus all I have to say is congratulatin the imagination of that page's author. YOU wikipedians are not entitled to manipulate with the truth even though the vice versa is said in talk pages. I and all true supporters of justice comdemn the blocking of this account. --Osmancan 16:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Osmancan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unfair block since no country exists such as "Kurdistan" officially

Decline reason:

Good bye. We don't need ultra-nationalists of any persuasion on Wikipedia. The article Kurdistan makes no claim that Kurdistan is a state, but only puts forwards verifiable facts written from a neutral point of view. Because you cannot accept that articles on matters on topics you disagree with can exist on Wikipedia and choose instead to vandalize them instead you are no longer welcome here. And no, I'm not a pro or anti-Kurd/Turk whatever -- I'm an Australian who like all admins here have ZERO TOLERANCE for editors who cannot follow Wikipedia:Consensus. -- Netsnipe ► 17:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.