User talk:OsirisV/Archive 4
Deadlinked Res Evil ref
[edit]You can view it using the wayback machine (http://web.archive.org/web/20080416074001/http://fs.finalfantasytr.com/search.asp?query=resident+evil) at archive.org, although I dunno how long it will be there/if we're allowed to use them, etc. Geoff B (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 6 — 4th Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2009, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Biohazard: Symphony Op. 91: Crime and Punishment
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Biohazard: Symphony Op. 91: Crime and Punishment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fleet Command (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Biohazard: The Umbrella Chronicles Original Soundtrack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fleet Command (talk) 21:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Biohazard: The Umbrella Chronicles Original Soundtrack, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biohazard: The Umbrella Chronicles Original Soundtrack. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fleet Command (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Biohazard: Symphony Op. 91: Crime and Punishment, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biohazard: Symphony Op. 91: Crime and Punishment. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fleet Command (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ruby2010 (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Biohazard Symphony.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Biohazard Symphony.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
RE: Resident Evil
[edit]So let me get this right, that means that the article is not canon? SGGH ping! 17:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Would you mind weighing back in and reverting it to whichever version states the game is not canon? I can't tell which one that is for sure. SGGH ping! 16:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Cumbria shootings
[edit]Please don't unilaterally move pages without discussion. Your move has been reverted, there is no good reason at all to capitalise Shootings. Are you going to capitalise massacre in Hungerford massacre? No, so please, discuss first, move later, not the other way around... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:RAC.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:RAC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Raccoon Crater.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Raccoon Crater.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010
[edit]The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Raccoon City redirect categorized as Fictional populated places in the United States
[edit]The other day I added Category:Fictional populated places in the United States to the Raccoon City redirect, and you undid it. I'm not going to do it again, but are you sure the categorization is somehow inappropriate or wrong? I wasn't trying to recreate the article, just add what I thought was an appropriate categorization that can remain even if the article is no more. Redirect categorizations are not without precedent, and if anything appear to be encouraged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.86.192 (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I felt that the categorisation of a redirect was unnecessary and was unaware of any legitimate need.-- OsirisV (talk) 23:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
The article 200th Jäger Division has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Procedual nomination on behalf of User:W. B. Wilson: 'I am pretty certain this division never existed. A report of its existence seems to have made its way onto axishistory.com (http://www.axishistory.com/index.php?id=961). Although the axishistory.com site states "Reference material on this unit - None known at this time -", I believe the presence of this unit on the axishistory.com site is an example of a typo being propagated, as Volume III of Wolf Keilig's Das Deutsche Heer shows General Schury commanding the 200th Jäger Division from February 1945 forward. However, this conflicts with the fact that Schury commanded the 100th Jäger Division from February - May 1945. I'm not sure if Keilig introduced the error or copied it from another source, but no German division with the number 200 appears in German orders of battle other than an obscure training unit that existed for several months in Poland during the early part of the war. Recommend this article be deleted as it is very doubtful that this unit existed at all.'
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)