User talk:Oshvision
Oshvision (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Oshvision (talk) 23:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)== ME ==
MY PAGE!
Could you either convince me that it is possible to run a train through Donyatt Halt by showing me a source that says it can be done or return the icon to its correct status as shown by that source, closed? Britmax (talk) 20:45, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem: :file:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as file:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.middletonpress.co.uk/details.php?bdetails=978%201%20901706%2030%207&PHPSESSID=d6b123a9f944b658482382231603556f, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk::file:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg]] and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, :file:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk::file:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on [[Talk::file:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg]]. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at file talk:Branch Lines Around Chard and Yeovil Book.jpg saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Pyrotec (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chard, Somerset. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Simple Bob (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Chard, Somerset, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Simple Bob (talk) 22:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Oshvision (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
CAN YOU UNBLOCK ME!!!! i need to edit Chard Branch Line
Decline reason:
You were blocked for persistently adding links to your own web site to Wikipedia, which is a violation of our spam guidelines regardless of the merits of the web site. Have faith that, if your web site is truly the most reliable source available, other users will cite it when adding information from it. Since you don't appear to be willing to stop adding these links, the block remains necessary. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You should have thought of that before you started spamming your own website on Wikipedia. Spammers get banned, it's that simple. --Simple Bob (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-ok ,now can someone unblock me, Oshvision (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
errm, excuse me..., my websites not spam, thankyou very much, i dedicate my time to adding and updating articals on wikipedia, so please, just unblock me and lets get on with the job, please....... Oshvision (talk) 22:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Of course it is spam, you own the site. Read WP:ELNO and WP:COI. You were warned, you even used a different IP address, perhaps to avoid detection, but you persisted in adding the same link despite the warnings. --Simple Bob (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- ok then, ive learnt my lesson, now unblock me please, im tired :(... maybe the link should go on as an external reference, i havent go anyone else to site it for me, so i added it myself, help me/// ?? not sure about the ip though, im on a homehub???
Oshvision (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the admin said my source is the most reliable, so whay hasn't someone unblocked me yet, (sound to me like a gang up situation is going on) what protection do i have as an appealler, wiki's not very helpful ,however to block someone seems too easy??? Oshvision (talk) 23:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're quoting administrator's comments entirely opposite from what they were, and you show no understanding of why you were blocked. Your talk page access has been revoked as I see no ability for you to be able to contribute constructively to this site. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 23:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- No, I did not say that. In fact, your web site doesn't appear to meet the reliable source guidelines at all. I linked them for you; didn't you read them? What I said was that IF it were the most reliable, someone else would add it- and that, even if you have the most important web site in the world, you'll still be blocked for linking to it yourself. Your request indicates that you still aren't willing to follow the rules, which makes it a bit pointless to make it. If you decide to write a better one, you might find the guide to appealing blocks useful. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
CAN YOU NOW UNBLOCK ME, I WONT DO IT AGAIN!! unless someone else adds it please"!"""""""" Oshvision (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Anyway, do you have a website, what is it, send me a link???
File source problem with File:ChardBranchLineJointRailwayLogo.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:ChardBranchLineJointRailwayLogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
File:BSicon StationOpen norail.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BSicon StationOpen norail.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
UTRS 44781
[edit]UTRS appeal #44781 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)