User talk:OsageCowboy
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Osage. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Osage~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
01:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! OsageCowboy,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 22:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Schilling
[edit]Hello OsageCowboy,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jeff Schilling for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. PureRED (talk) 16:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FireHost Company Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:FireHost Company Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Looks like the company changed its name and logo, so that's fine to delete.OsageCowboy (talk) 02:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The article Jeff Schilling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotional bio on an executive. Cites are mostly press releases or press release reprints, or occasions when he was quoted as a pundit - not independent third-party biographical coverage. Doesn't appear to meet any of the prongs of WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE shows passing mentions, a bit of punditry and a lot of other people of the same name.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Jeff Schilling for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Schilling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.